Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to diillson/chatcli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diillson/chatcli/main/.agent/skills/game-development/web-games/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/web-games)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/web-games"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/web-games/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/web-games"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/web-games.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00788 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
web-games scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to web-games — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web Browser Game Development
Framework selection and browser-specific principles.
1. Framework Selection
Decision Tree
What type of game?
│
├── 2D Game
│ ├── Full game engine features? → Phaser
│ └── Raw rendering power? → PixiJS
│
├── 3D Game
│ ├── Full engine (physics, XR)? → Babylon.js
│ └── Rendering focused? → Three.js
│
└── Hybrid / Canvas
└── Custom → Raw Canvas/WebGL
Comparison (2025)
| Framework | Type | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Phaser 4 | 2D | Full game features |
| PixiJS 8 | 2D | Rendering, UI |
| Three.js | 3D | Visualizations, lightweight |
| Babylon.js 7 | 3D | Full engine, XR |
2. WebGPU Adoption
Browser Support (2025)
| Browser | Support |
|---|---|
| Chrome | ✅ Since v113 |
| Edge | ✅ Since v113 |
| Firefox | ✅ Since v131 |
| Safari | ✅ Since 18.0 |
| Total | ~73% global |
Decision
- New projects: Use WebGPU with WebGL fallback
- Legacy support: Start with WebGL
- Feature detection: Check
navigator.gpu
3. Performance Principles
Browser Constraints
| Constraint | Strategy |
|---|---|
| No local file access | Asset bundling, CDN |
| Tab throttling | Pause when hidden |
| Mobile data limits | Compress assets |
| Audio autoplay | Require user interaction |
Optimization Priority
- Asset compression - KTX2, Draco, WebP
- Lazy loading - Load on demand
- Object pooling - Avoid GC
- Draw call batching - Reduce state changes
- Web Workers - Offload heavy computation
4. Asset Strategy
Compression Formats
| Type | Format |
|---|---|
| Textures | KTX2 + Basis Universal |
| Audio | WebM/Opus (fallback: MP3) |
| 3D Models | glTF + Draco/Meshopt |
Loading Strategy
| Phase | Load |
|---|---|
| Startup | Core assets, <2MB |
| Gameplay | Stream on demand |
| Background | Prefetch next level |
5. PWA for Games
Benefits
- Offline play
- Install to home screen
- Full screen mode
- Push notifications
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 151 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 1213dbf108ac
web-games is a skill published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 788 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to web-games, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-state-bar
A design guide for an agent status bar: a short, automatically updated summary of progress, remaining tasks, tool counts, errors, and system state placed near the latest model input.
context-engineering
A guide to organizing the instructions and information an AI agent receives at each step. It covers system prompts, tool descriptions, conversation history, on-demand skills, and protections against unsafe outside content.
kv-cache-design
A guide to arranging an AI agent's conversation so previously processed text can be reused. A KV cache stores intermediate results for earlier tokens, while a prompt cache reuses a stable beginning across requests.
loop-engineering
A guide to building reliable loops for AI agents that plan, act, check their work, and continue until a task is truly complete. It includes independent verification and a proposer-reviewer pattern in which one agent's work is checked using outside evidence.
reward-design
A guide to defining the scores that an AI agent receives during trial-and-error training. It covers checks based on rules, human preferences, or another model, and distinguishes rewarding the final result from rewarding the steps taken.
pptx
A guide for turning a paper, outline, or structured text into a PowerPoint presentation. It covers an 8–12-slide structure, concise slide points, and generation of a .pptx file.