Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/diodeme/gold-band/react-componentsnpx skills add diodeme/Gold-Band --skill react-componentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diodeme/Gold-BandWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/diodeme/gold-band/react-components)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diodeme/gold-band/react-components"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diodeme/gold-band/react-components.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00808 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
react:components scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/gold-standard-card.tsx 2.5 KB
- package-lock.json 7.0 KB
- package.json 355 B
- README.md 1.3 KB
- resources/architecture-checklist.md 613 B
- resources/component-template.tsx 1.0 KB
- resources/stitch-api-reference.md 1.2 KB
- resources/style-guide.json 496 B
- scripts/fetch-stitch.sh 1009 B runs code
- scripts/validate.js 2.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 51 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A d7d97de6990b
react:components is a skill published in the GitHub repository diodeme/Gold-Band (76 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 808 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
harness-creator
Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is…
pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and post a verdict comment. Stateful — if a previous review comment exists, review only the new commits since the last review and track whether prior findings were addressed. Focus on code cleanliness, duplication, and docs sync. Use when user says "review this PR", "check the PR", "leave…
new-plugin
Factory line for adding a new HAR verification plugin (like playwright or rocketsim) for any framework — research the framework docs, build the template under src/templates/plugins/, register it everywhere, validate on a real repository, and open a PR. Use when asked to add/create a plugin, plugin template, or…
factory-line
Factory line for executing one station of a declared multi-station program — read the installed line bundle (har line status), plan parallel work into isolated HAR slots, run the cumulative gate with har line gate, and hand off for human review. Use when asked to "run a factory line", "run the next station", "execute…
v1-milestone
Factory line for executing one milestone of the HAR v1.0.0 refactor (epic os-factory/har#225) — plan the wave of parallel subagents, implement each issue in its own HAR slot, ship stacked PRs, run the fixture-e2e milestone gate, and hand off for review. Use when asked to "run the next v1 milestone", "work on v1.0.0"…
debug-memory
Reproduce observational-memory bugs (reflection, recall, observer, freshness, eviction) by dumping the live /.duet/memory.db into a fixture and driving an eval against it. Use whenever the agent's memory misbehaves — wrong observations, bad reflections, missing recall, runaway tokens — or whenever the user asks to…