Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dirtytrii/codex-skills --skill gstack-qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dirtytrii/codex-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirtytrii/codex-skills/gstack-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirtytrii/codex-skills/gstack-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dirtytrii/codex-skills/gstack-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirtytrii/codex-skills/gstack-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dirtytrii/codex-skills/gstack-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00390 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
gstack-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A f7344c33e96b
gstack-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dirtytrii/codex-skills (11 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 390 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…
playwright-qa
QA engineering workflows on top of Playwright. Use when a QA engineer asks to design test cases from a ticket, PRD or acceptance criteria, decide what to automate, write a bug report from a failing test or trace, convert manual test cases (TestRail, Xray, CSV) into Playwright specs with case-ID traceability, or review…
browser-task-and-automation-and-delegation
A required procedure for browser actions carried out through a separate browser specialist. Browser actions include opening pages, filling forms, taking snapshots, performance checks, automated tests, and data collection.
testing-patterns
Cross-language testing strategies and patterns. Triggers on: test pyramid, unit test, integration test, e2e test, TDD, BDD, test coverage, mocking strategy, test doubles, test isolation.
playwright-best-practices
Use when writing or modifying Playwright tests (.spec.ts, .test.ts with @playwright/test imports).
scenario-testing
This skill should be used when writing tests, validating features, or needing to verify code works. Triggers on "write tests", "add test coverage", "validate feature", "integration test", "end-to-end", "e2e test", "mock", "unit test". Enforces scenario-driven testing with real dependencies in .scratch/ directory.