claudeframework: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/impact/SKILL.md

impact is a skill for Claude Code from dixus/claudeframework. It costs 32 tokens per session (688 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-change impact checker that finds where a function, class, method, or file is used, including related tests and frontend code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before changing shared functions, interfaces, or modules to find call sites, test mocks, and frontend consumers.
Why use it?
It shows what may break before you change shared code, so you can update affected callers and test doubles together.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is dixus/claudeframework's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claudeframework itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claudeframework configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to dixus/claudeframework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dixus/claudeframework/main/.claude/skills/impact/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dixus/claudeframework

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for impact

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for impact

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dixus/claudeframework/impact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 688 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00688
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00275
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00138
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00069

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 790e889db13b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

impact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/impact/SKILL.md · 76 lines

What it actually says

Analyze the blast radius of changing a function, method, class, or file before making the change.

$ARGUMENTS is the target to analyze. Can be:

  • A function name: enqueue_email
  • A file path: src/modules/documents/services.py
  • A class: SupplierInvitation
  • A method: Tender.clone

Steps

  1. Resolve the target — find the definition:

    • Use Grep to locate the function/class/method definition
    • Read the file to understand its signature (params, return type)
    • Note any recent signature changes (new optional params, changed return type)
  2. Find all call sites — everywhere the target is used:

    • Grep for the function/class name across the entire codebase
    • Group results by module: API services, routes, worker tasks, tests, frontend hooks
    • For each call site, note whether it passes all current params or relies on defaults
  3. Find all test mocks — tests that patch or mock the target:

    • Grep for patch("...target_name"), mock_target_name, AsyncMock references
    • Grep for vi.mock and vi.fn in frontend test files that reference the endpoint
    • Note which mock factories would need updating if the signature changes
  4. Find frontend consumers (if the target is a route or service behind a route):

    • Identify the API endpoint(s) that call this function
    • Grep frontend hooks/ and lib/ for the endpoint path
    • Check TypeScript types in types/api.ts that would need updating
  5. Find downstream dependencies — other functions that depend on the target's return value:

    • If the target returns an ORM object or dict, find code that accesses specific fields of that return value
    • If the target writes to DB, find queries that read from the same table
  6. Report — print a structured summary:

## Impact Analysis: `<target>`

### Definition
- File: <path>:<line>
- Signature: <current signature>

### Call Sites (<count>)
| File | Line | Passes all params? |
|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ✅ / ❌ missing: param_x, param_y |

### Test Mocks (<count>)
| Test file | Mock pattern | Needs update? |
|---|---|---|

### Frontend Consumers (<count>)
| File | Hook/Function | Endpoint |
|---|---|---|

### Downstream Dependencies
- <any functions that consume this target's return value>

### Risk Assessment
- **Blast radius**: small (≤3 files) / medium (4-10 files) / large (>10 files)
- **Recommended approach**: <one-line suggestion>

Do NOT make any code changes. This skill is read-only analysis.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 790e889db13b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

impact is a skill published in the GitHub repository dixus/claudeframework (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 688 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens