Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/djrhails/dotfiles/audit-context-buildingnpx skills add DJRHails/dotfiles --skill audit-context-buildinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DJRHails/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/djrhails/dotfiles/audit-context-building)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/djrhails/dotfiles/audit-context-building"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djrhails/dotfiles/audit-context-building.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.02155 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
audit-context-building scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to audit-context-building — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 305 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Context Builder Skill (Ultra-Granular Pure Context Mode)
1. Purpose
This skill governs how Claude thinks during the context-building phase of an audit.
When active, Claude will:
- Perform line-by-line / block-by-block code analysis by default.
- Apply First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows at micro scale.
- Continuously link insights → functions → modules → entire system.
- Maintain a stable, explicit mental model that evolves with new evidence.
- Identify invariants, assumptions, flows, and reasoning hazards.
This skill defines a structured analysis format (see Example: Function Micro-Analysis below) and runs before the vulnerability-hunting phase.
2. When to Use This Skill
Use when:
- Deep comprehension is needed before bug or vulnerability discovery.
- You want bottom-up understanding instead of high-level guessing.
- Reducing hallucinations, contradictions, and context loss is critical.
- Preparing for security auditing, architecture review, or threat modeling.
Do not use for:
- Vulnerability findings
- Fix recommendations
- Exploit reasoning
- Severity/impact rating
3. How This Skill Behaves
When active, Claude will:
- Default to ultra-granular analysis of each block and line.
- Apply micro-level First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows.
- Build and refine a persistent global mental model.
- Update earlier assumptions when contradicted ("Earlier I thought X; now Y.").
- Periodically anchor summaries to maintain stable context.
- Avoid speculation; express uncertainty explicitly when needed.
Goal: deep, accurate understanding, not conclusions.
Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| "I get the gist" | Gist-level understanding misses edge cases | Line-by-line analysis required |
| "This function is simple" | Simple functions compose into complex bugs | Apply 5 Whys anyway |
| "I'll remember this invariant" | You won't. Context degrades. | Write it down explicitly |
| "External call is probably fine" | External = adversarial until proven otherwise | Jump into code or model as hostile |
| "I can skip this helper" | Helpers contain assumptions that propagate | Trace the full call chain |
| "This is taking too long" | Rushed context = hallucinated vulnerabilities later | Slow is fast |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 305 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A c8a4b91af597
audit-context-building is a skill published in the GitHub repository DJRHails/dotfiles (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,155 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to audit-context-building, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autopilot-batch
Fan out a batch of autopilot-queued issues to parallel background worktree subagents — each runs /autopilot at the build model from its 'model:' label — with a gating review at Opus 5 or above and never below the build (Opus reviews Sonnet and Opus builds, Fable reviews Fable builds).
todoist-cli
Manage Todoist tasks, projects, labels, filters, sections, comments, reminders, and workspaces via the td CLI. Use when the user wants to view, create, update, complete, or organize Todoist items, or mentions tasks, inbox, today, upcoming, projects, labels, or filters.
autopilot
Carry a well-scoped GitHub issue through the full dev loop autonomously, stopping at a per-run tier boundary (PR-ready, or merge+deploy for small reversible changes).
qa-handoff
Generate a hands-on QA testing guide as a self-contained HTML page — for Rails apps or static (Hugo) sites. --publish uploads the HTML to the project's configured QA host.
walkthrough
Generate a hands-on browser walkthrough of a PR's user-facing changes to exercise before review; --publish posts the final version to the PR for QA.
dustoff
Assess a project that's been dormant for months and produce a prioritized re-entry plan — lifecycle stage, what's stale or broken, and how far the project's tooling has drifted from current conventions — delegating every fix to the skill that owns it, and optionally capturing the plan as a tracking issue that survives…