Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/djrhails/dotfiles/commitnpx skills add DJRHails/dotfiles --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DJRHails/dotfilesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00854 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00427 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a git commit for the current changes using a concise Conventional Commits-style subject.
Format
<type>(<scope>): <summary>
typeREQUIRED. Usefeatfor new features,fixfor bug fixes. Other common types:docs,refactor,chore,test,perf.scopeOPTIONAL. Short noun in parentheses for the affected area (e.g.,api,parser,ui).summaryREQUIRED. Short, imperative, <= 72 chars, no trailing period.
Notes
- Body is OPTIONAL. If needed, add a blank line after the subject and write short paragraphs.
- Do NOT include breaking-change markers or footers.
- Do NOT add sign-offs (no
Signed-off-by). - After committing, push to the current branch. Never push to
main/the default branch — if you are on it (and the repo's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md doesn't forbid branching), create a feature branch (<github-username>/<feature-name>) first, then push with-u. - Skip files containing secrets (
.env, credentials, tokens) and warn if any are staged. Skip.agents/settings.local.json/.claude/settings.local.json— add them to.gitignoreif not already ignored. - If it is unclear whether a file should be included, ask the user which files to commit.
- Treat any caller-provided arguments as additional commit guidance. Common patterns:
- Freeform instructions should influence scope, summary, and body.
- File paths or globs should limit which files to commit. If files are specified, only stage/commit those unless the user explicitly asks otherwise.
- If arguments combine files and instructions, honor both.
If CI doesn't start after a push
A push to a PR branch that spawns no workflow run is almost never a credential problem. Check the cheap causes first, in order:
- Conflicted PR —
gh pr view <n> --json mergeable,mergeStateStatus. A PR withmergeable: CONFLICTING/mergeStateStatus: DIRTYcreates nopull_requestruns at all: GitHub can't build therefs/pull/<n>/mergetest-merge commit those runs execute against. Merge or rebase the base branch, resolve, push — CI resumes on its own. - Trigger filters — read the workflow's
on:block.push: branches: [main]means feature-branch pushes get CI only via thepull_requestevent;paths:filters can skip a commit entirely. - Token type — only then suspect the credential (
gh auth status): an Actions-issuedghs_token suppresses workflow triggering; a user PAT (ghp_/github_pat_) does not.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 54 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A bd89e0c67ae7
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository DJRHails/dotfiles (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 854 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autopilot-batch
Fan out a batch of autopilot-queued issues to parallel background worktree subagents — each runs /autopilot at the build model from its 'model:' label — with a gating review at Opus 5 or above and never below the build (Opus reviews Sonnet and Opus builds, Fable reviews Fable builds).
todoist-cli
Manage Todoist tasks, projects, labels, filters, sections, comments, reminders, and workspaces via the td CLI. Use when the user wants to view, create, update, complete, or organize Todoist items, or mentions tasks, inbox, today, upcoming, projects, labels, or filters.
autopilot
Carry a well-scoped GitHub issue through the full dev loop autonomously, stopping at a per-run tier boundary (PR-ready, or merge+deploy for small reversible changes).
qa-handoff
Generate a hands-on QA testing guide as a self-contained HTML page — for Rails apps or static (Hugo) sites. --publish uploads the HTML to the project's configured QA host.
walkthrough
Generate a hands-on browser walkthrough of a PR's user-facing changes to exercise before review; --publish posts the final version to the PR for QA.
dustoff
Assess a project that's been dormant for months and produce a prioritized re-entry plan — lifecycle stage, what's stale or broken, and how far the project's tooling has drifted from current conventions — delegating every fix to the skill that owns it, and optionally capturing the plan as a tracking issue that survives…