incremental-implementation

incremental-implementation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Djtony707/TITAN. It costs 52 tokens per session (1,940 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of incremental-implementation, MIT.

A coding workflow for making large changes in small, working pieces. Each piece is tested and checked before the next one is added.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for features, refactors, or other changes spread across several files. It helps plan each slice, test it, verify the result, and then continue.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of building too much code before discovering a mistake. Smaller steps make failures easier to find and fix.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for features, refactors, or other changes spread across several files. It helps plan each slice, test it, verify the result, and then continue.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Djtony707/TITAN --skill incremental-implementation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Djtony707/TITAN

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for incremental-implementation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for incremental-implementation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djtony707/titan/incremental-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,940 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.01940
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00776
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00388
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00194

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 5f16adf54233, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

incremental-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to incremental-implementation — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

assets/agent-skills/incremental-implementation/SKILL.md · 246 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Incremental Implementation

Overview

Build in thin vertical slices — implement one piece, test it, verify it, then expand. Avoid implementing an entire feature in one pass. Each increment should leave the system in a working, testable state. This is the execution discipline that makes large features manageable.

When to Use

  • Implementing any multi-file change
  • Building a new feature from a task breakdown
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Any time you're tempted to write more than ~100 lines before testing

When NOT to use: Single-file, single-function changes where the scope is already minimal.

The Increment Cycle

┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                      │
│   Implement ──→ Test ──→ Verify ──┐  │
│       ▲                           │  │
│       └───── Commit ◄─────────────┘  │
│              │                       │
│              ▼                       │
│          Next slice                  │
│                                      │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

For each slice:

  1. Implement the smallest complete piece of functionality
  2. Test — run the test suite (or write a test if none exists)
  3. Verify — confirm the slice works as expected (tests pass, build succeeds, manual check)
  4. Commit -- save your progress with a descriptive message (see git-workflow-and-versioning for atomic commit guidance)
  5. Move to the next slice — carry forward, don't restart

Slicing Strategies

Vertical Slices (Preferred)

Build one complete path through the stack:

Slice 1: Create a task (DB + API + basic UI)
    → Tests pass, user can create a task via the UI

Slice 2: List tasks (query + API + UI)
    → Tests pass, user can see their tasks

Slice 3: Edit a task (update + API + UI)
    → Tests pass, user can modify tasks

Slice 4: Delete a task (delete + API + UI + confirmation)
    → Tests pass, full CRUD complete

Each slice delivers working end-to-end functionality.

Read the full file on GitHub · 246 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 246 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 5f16adf54233

Subscribe to this mod's changes

incremental-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Djtony707/TITAN (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,940 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to incremental-implementation, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

review-prs

Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…

googleapis/mcp-toolbox · 162 tokens

stale-sweep

Sweep the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo for issues and PRs with no real activity in N days (default 60), sort each by whose silence it is (the author's, ours, or nobody's), and draft the nudge or close comment. Use whenever a maintainer asks for a stale sweep, backlog cleanup, or an SLO check, e.g. "stale sweep", "find…

googleapis/mcp-toolbox · 159 tokens

reproduce-bug

Reproduce a reported bug in googleapis/mcp-toolbox and decide whether it is real, delivering an evidence-backed verdict: confirmed, already fixed, misconfiguration, client-side, works as intended, not reproducible, or blocked. Use whenever a maintainer asks you to reproduce, verify, confirm, or investigate a bug…

googleapis/mcp-toolbox · 130 tokens

fix-failing-tests

Diagnose a failing test in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo and land a fix by reasoning from the actual error: read the failure, reproduce it, shrink it until the cause is forced into the open, then fix the cause. Use this whenever a test or CI job is red, a build breaks after a change, many packages fail at once, or a…

googleapis/mcp-toolbox · 87 tokens

tool-abuse-detection

Detect tool misuse and unexpected code execution via dialogue testing. Use when the agent exposes file, code-execution, or network tools.

Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard · 32 tokens

dev-browser

Browser automation with persistent page state. Use when users ask to navigate websites, fill forms, take screenshots, extract web data, test web apps, or automate browser workflows. Trigger phrases include "go to [url]", "click on", "fill out the form", "take a screenshot", "scrape", "automate", "test the website"…

MemTensor/MemOS · 84 tokens