Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Djtony707/TITAN --skill scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Djtony707/TITANWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djtony707/titan/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/djtony707/titan/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/djtony707/titan/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01007 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00504 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
scholar-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scholar Evaluation
Use this skill to evaluate academic or scientific work with a repeatable rubric.
When to Use
- Reviewing a research paper, proposal, thesis chapter, or literature review.
- Checking whether claims are supported by cited evidence.
- Evaluating methodology, study design, analysis, or limitations.
- Comparing two or more papers for quality or relevance.
- Producing structured feedback for revision.
Evaluation Scope
Start by identifying the artifact:
- empirical research paper
- theoretical paper
- technical report
- systematic or narrative literature review
- research proposal
- thesis or dissertation chapter
- conference abstract or short paper
Then choose scope:
- comprehensive: all rubric dimensions
- targeted: one or two dimensions, such as method or citations
- comparative: rank multiple works against the same rubric
Rubric
Score each applicable dimension from 1 to 5:
- 5: excellent; clear, rigorous, and publication-ready
- 4: good; minor improvements needed
- 3: adequate; meaningful gaps but usable
- 2: weak; substantial revision needed
- 1: poor; major validity or clarity problems
Use N/A for dimensions that do not apply.
1. Problem and Research Question
- Is the problem clear and specific?
- Is the contribution meaningful?
- Are scope and assumptions explicit?
- Does the question match the claimed contribution?
2. Literature and Context
- Is relevant prior work covered?
- Does the work synthesize rather than merely list sources?
- Are gaps accurately identified?
- Are recent and foundational sources balanced?
3. Methodology
- Does the method answer the research question?
- Are design choices justified?
- Are variables, datasets, participants, or materials described clearly?
- Could another researcher reproduce the work?
- Are ethical and practical constraints acknowledged?
4. Data and Evidence
- Are data sources credible and appropriate?
- Is sample size or corpus coverage adequate?
- Are inclusion, exclusion, and preprocessing decisions documented?
- Are missing data and bias risks discussed?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 161 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A cb722947dbbc
scholar-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Djtony707/TITAN (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,007 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Phone Use
MUST Load this skill for ANY task that involves GUI interaction or device control — opening apps, tapping, typing, scrolling, swiping, Back/Home/Recents, reading the screen, or any workflow that touches on-screen content. Load this even when the user does not explicitly mention the device — if the task implies a GUI…
release-new-version
Use when the user wants to release a new Zafiro version — drafting bilingual release notes, deciding the next version number, bumping app/build.gradle.kts, tagging, and publishing to GitHub (main repo, optionally the Xposed repo).
automation
Instructions for managing scheduled tasks through the host's structured automation tool, including reminders, delayed work, recurring checks, and result delivery.
robust-error-handling-in-scripts
Use this skill when writing shell scripts, Python automation, or any unattended batch job. Ensure failures are detected, logged, and handled — never silently ignored.
structured-logging-and-observability
Use this skill when building production services, pipelines, or automation that needs to be debugged, monitored, or audited. Add structured logs, metrics, and health checks before shipping any service.
rosclaw-embodied
A set of rules for completing robot tasks in ROSClaw, a system for running and checking robot work. It covers approved robot files, acceptance evidence, and separate rules for simulation and real hardware.