Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dkadts/landing-kit-building --skill briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dkadts/landing-kit-buildingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dkadts/landing-kit-building/brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dkadts/landing-kit-building/brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dkadts/landing-kit-building/brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dkadts/landing-kit-building/brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dkadts/landing-kit-building/brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00644 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/brief
Guides the user through the questionnaire. Fills brief/00-priority.md → brief/08-content-pipeline.md.
When to use
- Start of a new project (before any
/build). - User prefers a dialog over filling .md files by hand.
- Revising an existing brief.
Process
Step 1. Read existing files
Read every brief/*.md. Determine which fields are filled, which are TBD.
Step 2. Ask the first — most important — question
Desktop-first or mobile-first?
This decides:
- Assembly order (down or up)
- Block composition
- Reference viewport (1920px or 390px)
Help to choose: <brief decision table from 00-priority.md>
Wait for an explicit answer. Save to brief/00-priority.md.
Step 3. Walk files 01-08 in order
For each file:
- List
TBDfields. - Ask one question at a time (do not batch 10 questions at once — user tires).
- Use checklists where preset options exist.
- Save the answer (Edit tool).
Step 4. Special attention — niche discovery
brief/01-business.md — niche section — critical for /copy-analyze.
Do not accept "beauty" — narrow it to "men's Botox for CEOs 35-50 in Barcelona".
Do not accept "clients" — narrow maturity (cold/warm/hot).
Step 5. After 07-interactive
If the user checked interactive blocks — offer to run /blocks immediately to configure.
Step 6. Final summary
Show brief completeness: how many fields LOCKED, how many TBD. If TBD remain — what to ask the client.
Rules of behavior
- One field — one question. Do not batch.
- Do not guess for the user. If unclear — clarify.
- Use examples. "e.g. form submission → manager calls within 2 hours".
- Save as you go. Not at the end. Otherwise if the session drops — everything's lost.
- Respect status. If a field is already filled — do not re-ask, only clarify if needed.
What NOT to do
- Do not start
/design-lockuntil01-business+02-audience+05-designare filled. - Do not suggest skipping
00-priority— it's critical. - Do not fill
brief/copy-analysis.md— that's/copy-analyze. - Do not touch
brief/blocks/*.md— that's/blocks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 240c3c7ce1d6
brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository dkadts/landing-kit-building (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 644 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
next-upgrade
Upgrade Next.js to the latest version following official migration guides and codemods.
deploy
Ship a build reversibly — to a host you manage or a platform that manages it. Pick the topology first, keep the previous version reachable, gate on health, roll back without rebuilding. Use when shipping anywhere users can reach.
regenerate-api
Regenerate the AppointMe frontend API client (orval/TanStack Query hooks + TypeScript schemas) after the backend OpenAPI surface changes. Use this whenever backend endpoints, request/response DTOs, or other contract-affecting types are added, removed, or modified — e.g. after editing files under src/AppointMe.Api…
db-migration
Apply schema migrations safely: detect the tool, classify the change by risk, gate destructive ones behind approval, back up in prod, preview-apply-verify, roll back on failure. Use when a schema change is about to be applied to any environment.
dependency-audit
Dependency risk assessment, read-only: known CVEs, deprecated packages, licence compliance, maintenance status, lockfile integrity, and a justification for every new dependency. Acting on it is dependency-upgrade.
verify
Build, launch, and drive the AppointMe stack to verify a change end-to-end at its runtime surface.