Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dmae97/omk --skill principle-prove-it-worksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dmae97/omkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmae97/omk/principle-prove-it-works)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmae97/omk/principle-prove-it-works"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmae97/omk/principle-prove-it-works/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmae97/omk/principle-prove-it-works"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmae97/omk/principle-prove-it-works.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00297 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
pstack-principle-prove-it-works scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- principle-prove-it-works — 92% identical, 4 lines differ
- principle-prove-it-works — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- principle-prove-it-works — 92% identical, 4 lines differ
- principle-prove-it-works — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
What it actually says
Prove It Works
Verify every task output by checking the real thing directly. Do not infer from proxies, self-reports, or "it compiles."
Why: Unverified work has unknown correctness. Indirect verification (file mtimes, output freshness, agent self-reports, cached screenshots) feels cheaper than direct observation. Acting on a wrong inference costs far more than checking the source.
Check the real thing, not a proxy:
- Check process liveness directly, not indirectly through derived state
- Read the actual value, not a cached or derived representation
- When verification fails, suspect the observation method before suspecting the system
Script the check when you can
The strongest proof is a deterministic script that re-runs the same comparison, not a one-time eyeball. Write the script, run it, and keep its output as an artifact a reviewer can re-run instead of trusting your word.
Keep the artifact visible for the human. Commit it only for large or complex work where the trail has to be auditable later, like a big port or migration (the show-me-your-work skill).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 23 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 0e58ec00f245
pstack-principle-prove-it-works is a skill published in the GitHub repository dmae97/omk (152 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 297 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
ci-triage
Diagnose failing CI, build, release-gate, or test runs for Cool Workflow. Use when a GitHub Actions check, local npm test, npm run build, release gate, smoke test, or generated-manifest check fails and Codex must identify the first actionable failure with logs and verifier commands.
pr-review
Review Cool Workflow pull requests or branch diffs. Use when Codex must inspect code changes for bugs, regressions, FreeBSD/POLA violations, missing tests, generated artifact drift, release-contract risk, or CI implications, and return findings first with file/line citations.
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
agent-upkeep
Perform one small, scoped maintenance improvement to the Elements monorepo and open a single reviewable pull request. Use this skill for scheduled or unattended upkeep runs that improve unit test coverage for one file, fix one behavioral bug in one module, or move one off ESLint rule toward enforcement to reduce…
agent-inspect
Local evidence debugger and trajectory-test toolkit for TypeScript AI agents. Use when capturing framework-faithful traces, asserting TraceContract/TraceFacts, packaging Evidence v2, or inspecting local runs over read-only MCP (gettracefacts).
test-fix
Diagnose and minimally fix a failing test, then re-run.