Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dmoskov/sharedskills --skill self-critiquegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dmoskov/sharedskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmoskov/sharedskills/self-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmoskov/sharedskills/self-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmoskov/sharedskills/self-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmoskov/sharedskills/self-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmoskov/sharedskills/self-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00724 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade B, and why
self-critique scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
chmod 600 ~/.config/ai-dev-tools/gemini_api_key How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Self-Critique Skill
Implements the "confessions" pattern: after completing work, an independent model (Gemini) reviews it, so the author model's blind spots don't go unchallenged. The reviewer returns structured issues (category, severity, location, suggested fix) and an overall confidence score.
When to Use
- After completing a significant code change
- Before committing to version control
- When uncertain about an implementation decision
- As a periodic audit pass over recent work
Setup (one-time)
- Get a Gemini API key from https://aistudio.google.com/apikey
- Store it:
Or set themkdir -p ~/.config/ai-dev-tools echo "your-api-key-here" > ~/.config/ai-dev-tools/gemini_api_key chmod 600 ~/.config/ai-dev-tools/gemini_api_keyGEMINI_API_KEYenvironment variable. - Optional: override the reviewer model with
GEMINI_MODEL(pin exact model IDs — floating aliases can silently change behavior).
How to Use
Paths resolve against your ai-dev-tools checkout (see the AI_DEV_TOOLS_DIR
convention in skills/README.md).
After completing a task, run the critique script with a description of what was done:
python3 "${AI_DEV_TOOLS_DIR:-.}/skills/self-critique/gemini_critique.py" \
--task "Implemented user authentication" --files src/auth.py src/middleware.py
Or for a git-based review of recent changes:
python3 "${AI_DEV_TOOLS_DIR:-.}/skills/self-critique/gemini_critique.py" \
--git-diff HEAD~1 --task "Recent changes"
Focus the critique on one dimension:
python3 "${AI_DEV_TOOLS_DIR:-.}/skills/self-critique/gemini_critique.py" \
--task "Caching layer" --files cache.py --focus security
Add --json for machine-readable output. The script exits non-zero if any
critical-severity issue is found, so it can gate CI or pre-commit flows.
Critique Categories
- Correctness - Logic errors, edge cases, off-by-one errors
- Security - Vulnerabilities, injection risks, data exposure
- Performance - Inefficiencies, N+1 queries, memory leaks
- Maintainability - Code clarity, naming, documentation gaps
- Completeness - Missing tests, error handling, validation
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 21 tokens per session scan B 61e7dacd2972
self-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository dmoskov/sharedskills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 724 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks for root). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…