Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add doccker/cc-use-exp --skill refactor-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doccker/cc-use-expWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doccker/cc-use-exp/refactor-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doccker/cc-use-exp/refactor-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doccker/cc-use-exp/refactor-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doccker/cc-use-exp/refactor-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doccker/cc-use-exp/refactor-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.06191 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.02476 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00619 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 696 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A bbbf142b5e34
refactor-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository doccker/cc-use-exp (1,064 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 6,191 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mantis-plan
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-researcher
Audits production source code files based on the strategy in workspace/plan.json. Use when a review plan exists and you need to perform static analysis and deep-dive reviews of targeted files. Don't use for planning, deduplicating, or writing patches.
mantis-review
Independently reviews findings and filters out false positives. Use when consolidated findings need validation against the actual source code. Don't use for reproducing crashes or patching code.
mantis-summarize
Pre-processes the repository by generating security-focused summaries (mantis-summary.md) for each directory to make planning and research more efficient. Use when starting a review campaign to map the codebase before threat modeling and planning. Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching…
mantis-launch
Launches automated vulnerability review campaigns on target files or repositories. Use to initiate Mantis vulnerability review pipelines with automated preflight checks, environment auto-configuration, and runtime overrides (sandboxes, models, endpoints). Don't use for configuring settings without scanning or for…
conductor-review
Reviews the completed track work against guidelines and the plan. Acts as a Principal Software Engineer to ensure quality and compliance.