Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add docutray/devflow-skill --skill devflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/docutray/devflow-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/docutray/devflow-skill/devflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docutray/devflow-skill/devflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docutray/devflow-skill/devflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docutray/devflow-skill/devflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docutray/devflow-skill/devflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01791 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00716 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
devflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/scripts/opsx-validate.sh 3.1 KB runs code
- assets/templates/python/check.template.md 4.6 KB
- assets/templates/python/dev.template.md 7.1 KB
- assets/templates/typescript-node/check.template.md 5.1 KB
- assets/templates/typescript-node/dev.template.md 7.1 KB
- references/check.md 6.6 KB
- references/dev.md 9.0 KB
- references/epic.md 4.3 KB
- references/feat.md 3.9 KB
- references/openspec.md 19 KB
- references/research.md 2.2 KB
- references/review-pr.md 6.1 KB
- references/setup.md 6.1 KB
- references/worktrees.md 5.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -10 lines · -36 tokens per session 3c0688afcac6
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A dbedd13ddf57
devflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository docutray/devflow-skill (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,791 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-development-guide
Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
recipe-review
Reviews completed implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved corrections.
recipe-diagnose
Investigate problem, verify findings, and derive solutions.
audit
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
coding-principles
Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.