Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to docxology/codomyrmex. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docxology/codomyrmex/main/.agents/skills/systems-thinking/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/docxology/codomyrmexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/codomyrmex/systems-thinking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/codomyrmex/systems-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/codomyrmex/systems-thinking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/codomyrmex/systems-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/codomyrmex/systems-thinking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00217 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00087 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
systems-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Systems Thinking
Use this skill when a local change may alter agent behavior, tool safety, documentation discoverability, operational load, or downstream workflows.
- Define the system boundary, purpose, owners, users, and external dependencies.
- Map inputs, outputs, stocks, flows, constraints, and state transitions.
- Trace direct and indirect dependencies, feedback loops, delays, bottlenecks, and incentives.
- Look for second-order effects: what the change makes easier, harder, more likely, or invisible.
- Prefer interventions at high-leverage points: information quality, interfaces, defaults, feedback, and constraints before adding complexity.
- Define leading indicators, guardrails, rollback conditions, and a verification plan.
Output a small causal map or table plus the proposed intervention, expected downstream effects, risks, and measurements. Treat local optimization as suspect when it worsens system-level outcomes.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A f65629e3c2c1
systems-thinking is a skill published in the GitHub repository docxology/codomyrmex (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 217 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
create-tech-design
Only use when the user explicitly invokes this skill by name.
iterate-tech-design
Only use when the user explicitly invokes this skill by name.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
implement-outline
Only use when the user explicitly invokes this skill by name.