Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dogwood-policy/dogwood. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dogwood-policy/dogwood/main/.claude/skills/authoring-service-schema/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dogwood-policy/dogwoodWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00216 | $0.04191 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00108 | $0.02096 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00838 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00419 |
Grade A, and why
authoring-service-schema scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Authoring a Dogwood service schema (events + providers)
Your job: produce the service-schema half of a Dogwood schema — an event
schema (.dwschema) and/or an information-provider declarations file
(providers.json plus its Rhai implementation) — that parses, is well-formed,
and lets the policies you care about validate against a concrete action schema.
The service schema is entirely optional and defaults sensibly. The default
event schema declares three kinds — request (the only decision kind),
response, and error (both history-only) — each carrying the action's inputs
(response also its outputs) plus the reserved leaves callerPrincipal /
callerResource / requestId / sessionId. Crucially, callerPrincipal is a
universal symmetric pin (pin callerPrincipal: principalType(A) = principal on every kind), so the default runs under key-local semantics:
every temporal predicate is silently correlated to the current request's
principal, and other principals' events are invisible to it. The default
look-back cap is max_window = 24h, the default provider set is empty, and
the default macro library is the small standard one (count_within,
sum_within, count_distinct_within, bind). So the most important decision
is Step 0: do you even need one? If not, the best service schema is no
service schema — omit it and Dogwood uses the default.
This skill has two cores — events and providers — plus macros as a related seam (Step 3, briefly; the guide owns it). Do not invent DSL or JSON from memory: the guide is exhaustive and every construct is corpus-verified. Follow the steps in order.
Step 0 — Decide whether you need a service schema at all (do this first)
Write a custom event schema only if the application's event model diverges from the default request/response/error model in one of these ways:
- A history-only event kind the default lacks — an
audit/outcomekind, or renaming the set (attempt/outcomeinstead ofrequest/response). The default already givesrequest(decision) +response+error(history); customize only to go beyond that. - A different decision point — some kind other than
requestmust run authorization (mark itdecision). - A renamed or extra reserved/principal field — the injected principal is
actornotcallerPrincipal, or an extra__session_id. - Nested record fields — hierarchical fields like
__platform.session.id. - A different pin / correlation invariant — the default already pins
callerPrincipalon every kind (key-local, per-principal semantics). Write a custom schema to pin a different key (a session id), to add an extra pin, or — going the other way — to get global-trace semantics (a policy about any principal's events, e.g. "N logins by any user"), which requires a schema without the universal principal pin (the shippedconfiguration/event-schemas/unpinned.dwschemais exactly that). - A longer look-back than 24h — every temporal window is capped by the
event schema's
max_windowdirective, 24h when absent, so a policy withwithin 7dis a validation error under the default. Raising the cap is an event-schema change: copy the default schema and addmax_window = <interval>(e.g.max_window = 30d) at the top of the file. A.dwschemacontaining only the directive declares zero events — it passes the isolatedschema eventcheck but every policy predicate then fails the compositevalidate(does not name a declared event) — so always carry the event declarations along with the directive.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 292 lines · 216 tokens per session scan A 37487f67cb6a
authoring-service-schema is a skill published in the GitHub repository dogwood-policy/dogwood (384 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 216 tokens to every session and 4,191 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mem0-oss-to-platform
Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…
agui-dotnet-protobuf
Use the protobuf wire transport (instead of the default Server-Sent Events) for an AG-UI connection with the AG-UI .NET SDK — a compact binary event stream negotiated via the Accept header. USE FOR: making an AGUIChatClient prefer protobuf by wiring an AGUIEventStreamHandler with ProtobufEventStreamFormatter (then…
azure-mgmt-botservice-dotnet
Azure Resource Manager SDK for Bot Service in .NET. Management plane operations for creating and managing Azure Bot resources, channels (Teams, DirectLine, Slack), and connection settings. Triggers: "Bot Service", "BotResource", "Azure Bot", "DirectLine channel", "Teams channel", "bot management .NET", "create bot".
fastapi-router-py
Create FastAPI routers with CRUD operations, authentication dependencies, and proper response models. Use when building REST API endpoints, creating new routes, implementing CRUD operations, or adding authenticated endpoints in FastAPI applications.
aws-sdk-java-v2-core
Provides AWS SDK for Java 2.x client configuration, credential resolution, HTTP client tuning, timeout, retry, and testing patterns. Use when creating or hardening AWS service clients, wiring Spring Boot beans, debugging auth or region issues, or choosing sync vs async SDK usage.
migrate-segw-to-rap
Reverse-engineer a SEGW-built OData V2 service (MPC/DPC/MPCEXT/DPCEXT) into a modern RAP V4 service — tables, CDS views (interface + projection), behavior definitions, draft entities, service definition + binding. Use when asked to "migrate this SEGW service to RAP", "convert OData V2 to V4 RAP", "modernize this…