dogwood: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/authoring-service-schema/SKILL.md

authoring-service-schema is a skill for Claude Code from dogwood-policy/dogwood. It costs 216 tokens per session (4,191 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A skill for creating or changing Dogwood service schemas: structured definitions of events, fields, and information providers used to check authorization policies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define request, response, and error events; describe nested records and reserved fields; or add computed facts that policies can use.
Why use it?
It helps ensure that policies are checked against a clear description of the actions and data in a service, rather than against an undefined interface.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

This is dogwood-policy/dogwood's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on dogwood itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything dogwood configures →

Part of the dogwood plugin — 4 skills shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to dogwood-policy/dogwood. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dogwood-policy/dogwood/main/.claude/skills/authoring-service-schema/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dogwood-policy/dogwood

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dogwood, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for authoring-service-schema

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for authoring-service-schema

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogwood-policy/dogwood/authoring-service-schema.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 216 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,191 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00216 $0.04191
Opus 5 $0.00108 $0.02096
Sonnet 5 $0.00043 $0.00838
Haiku 4.5 $0.00022 $0.00419

Measured 12d ago against content hash 37487f67cb6a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

authoring-service-schema scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/authoring-service-schema/SKILL.md · 292 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Authoring a Dogwood service schema (events + providers)

Your job: produce the service-schema half of a Dogwood schema — an event schema (.dwschema) and/or an information-provider declarations file (providers.json plus its Rhai implementation) — that parses, is well-formed, and lets the policies you care about validate against a concrete action schema.

The service schema is entirely optional and defaults sensibly. The default event schema declares three kinds — request (the only decision kind), response, and error (both history-only) — each carrying the action's inputs (response also its outputs) plus the reserved leaves callerPrincipal / callerResource / requestId / sessionId. Crucially, callerPrincipal is a universal symmetric pin (pin callerPrincipal: principalType(A) = principal on every kind), so the default runs under key-local semantics: every temporal predicate is silently correlated to the current request's principal, and other principals' events are invisible to it. The default look-back cap is max_window = 24h, the default provider set is empty, and the default macro library is the small standard one (count_within, sum_within, count_distinct_within, bind). So the most important decision is Step 0: do you even need one? If not, the best service schema is no service schema — omit it and Dogwood uses the default.

This skill has two cores — events and providers — plus macros as a related seam (Step 3, briefly; the guide owns it). Do not invent DSL or JSON from memory: the guide is exhaustive and every construct is corpus-verified. Follow the steps in order.

Step 0 — Decide whether you need a service schema at all (do this first)

Write a custom event schema only if the application's event model diverges from the default request/response/error model in one of these ways:

  • A history-only event kind the default lacks — an audit/outcome kind, or renaming the set (attempt/outcome instead of request/response). The default already gives request (decision) + response + error (history); customize only to go beyond that.
  • A different decision point — some kind other than request must run authorization (mark it decision).
  • A renamed or extra reserved/principal field — the injected principal is actor not callerPrincipal, or an extra __session_id.
  • Nested record fields — hierarchical fields like __platform.session.id.
  • A different pin / correlation invariant — the default already pins callerPrincipal on every kind (key-local, per-principal semantics). Write a custom schema to pin a different key (a session id), to add an extra pin, or — going the other way — to get global-trace semantics (a policy about any principal's events, e.g. "N logins by any user"), which requires a schema without the universal principal pin (the shipped configuration/event-schemas/unpinned.dwschema is exactly that).
  • A longer look-back than 24h — every temporal window is capped by the event schema's max_window directive, 24h when absent, so a policy with within 7d is a validation error under the default. Raising the cap is an event-schema change: copy the default schema and add max_window = <interval> (e.g. max_window = 30d) at the top of the file. A .dwschema containing only the directive declares zero events — it passes the isolated schema event check but every policy predicate then fails the composite validate (does not name a declared event) — so always carry the event declarations along with the directive.

Read the full file on GitHub · 292 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 292 lines · 216 tokens per session scan A 37487f67cb6a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

authoring-service-schema is a skill published in the GitHub repository dogwood-policy/dogwood (384 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 216 tokens to every session and 4,191 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mem0-oss-to-platform

Plan and then execute a migration of a project from the mem0 open-source / self-hosted SDK (the local Memory class) to the mem0 Platform / hosted / managed SDK (the MemoryClient class). Use this whenever a developer wants to move, switch, or migrate their mem0 usage off OSS/self-hosted to the hosted API — e.g.…

mem0ai/mem0 · 273 tokens

agui-dotnet-protobuf

Use the protobuf wire transport (instead of the default Server-Sent Events) for an AG-UI connection with the AG-UI .NET SDK — a compact binary event stream negotiated via the Accept header. USE FOR: making an AGUIChatClient prefer protobuf by wiring an AGUIEventStreamHandler with ProtobufEventStreamFormatter (then…

ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui · 162 tokens

azure-mgmt-botservice-dotnet

Azure Resource Manager SDK for Bot Service in .NET. Management plane operations for creating and managing Azure Bot resources, channels (Teams, DirectLine, Slack), and connection settings. Triggers: "Bot Service", "BotResource", "Azure Bot", "DirectLine channel", "Teams channel", "bot management .NET", "create bot".

microsoft/skills · 78 tokens

fastapi-router-py

Create FastAPI routers with CRUD operations, authentication dependencies, and proper response models. Use when building REST API endpoints, creating new routes, implementing CRUD operations, or adding authenticated endpoints in FastAPI applications.

microsoft/skills · 46 tokens

aws-sdk-java-v2-core

Provides AWS SDK for Java 2.x client configuration, credential resolution, HTTP client tuning, timeout, retry, and testing patterns. Use when creating or hardening AWS service clients, wiring Spring Boot beans, debugging auth or region issues, or choosing sync vs async SDK usage.

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 62 tokens

migrate-segw-to-rap

Reverse-engineer a SEGW-built OData V2 service (MPC/DPC/MPCEXT/DPCEXT) into a modern RAP V4 service — tables, CDS views (interface + projection), behavior definitions, draft entities, service definition + binding. Use when asked to "migrate this SEGW service to RAP", "convert OData V2 to V4 RAP", "modernize this…

arc-mcp/arc-1 · 106 tokens