Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dokhacgiakhoa/Agent-Skills-4-Vibe-Coding-CLI --skill code-review-excellencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dokhacgiakhoa/Agent-Skills-4-Vibe-Coding-CLIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dokhacgiakhoa/agent-skills-4-vibe-coding-cli/code-review-excellence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dokhacgiakhoa/agent-skills-4-vibe-coding-cli/code-review-excellence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dokhacgiakhoa/agent-skills-4-vibe-coding-cli/code-review-excellence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dokhacgiakhoa/agent-skills-4-vibe-coding-cli/code-review-excellence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dokhacgiakhoa/agent-skills-4-vibe-coding-cli/code-review-excellence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00308 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-excellence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 3cad9a5ff1e4
code-review-excellence is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dokhacgiakhoa/Agent-Skills-4-Vibe-Coding-CLI (510 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 308 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
genie-orca-review
Independent, read-only review of a group, a wish, or a PR on Orca — SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged findings. Council and retro are this skill with a different input.
pr-review
Intent-aware map-reduce PR review with CI/CD support, confidence gating, and intelligent comment deduplication.
atomic-review
Compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", or invokes /atomic-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
handoff
Transfer the current coding, debugging, planning, or architecture session to AI Badger. Use for broad session continuation; use badger-review for an independent review.
ralphctl-code-review-and-quality
Multi-phase code-quality skill — primary frame for the evaluator role in Execute, the architecture axis in Plan, and correctness/readability in Refine. Multi-axis code review with severity vocabulary. Use when acting as the evaluator assessing a generator's output, and when reviewing any change before signalling…