Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to doncheli/don-cheli-sdd. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/main/.agent/skills/doncheli-pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doncheli/don-cheli-sddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/doncheli-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/doncheli-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/doncheli-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/doncheli-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doncheli/don-cheli-sdd/doncheli-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
doncheli-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Don Cheli: PR Review
Instructions
- Accept a PR number, URL, or diff as input
- Fetch the diff using
gh pr diff <number>or read the provided diff - Review in this sequence:
- Spec alignment: does the code implement what the spec says? Flag any drift
- Tests: are new behaviors covered? Is coverage maintained above 85%?
- Code quality: complexity, duplication, naming, error handling
- Security: OWASP Top 10 surface, secrets in code, input validation
- Breaking changes: API contract changes, schema migrations, deprecations
- Categorize each finding: [blocker | warning | suggestion | nitpick]
- Blockers must be resolved before merge — list them prominently
- Never approve a PR with unresolved blockers
- Generate a structured review comment ready to post with
gh pr review - If spec docs are missing for a non-trivial feature, flag as a warning
Output Format
## PR Review — #142 "feat: add voice mode integration"
### Spec Alignment ✅
All scenarios in specs/voice.feature are covered by the implementation.
### Blockers 🔴
1. src/voice/transcriber.ts:34 — API key hardcoded. Must use env var VOICE_API_KEY.
### Warnings 🟡
1. src/voice/transcriber.ts — coverage 72%, below 85% threshold.
2. No migration doc for the new voice_sessions table.
### Suggestions 🟢
1. Consider extracting the cleanup logic at line 88 into a private method.
### Nitpicks
1. Line 12: typo "recieve" → "receive"
### Verdict: CHANGES REQUESTED
Resolve 1 blocker before merging.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 48 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 46ba5e72048d
doncheli-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository doncheli/don-cheli-sdd (57 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 439 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship
Create a rich PR from planning artifacts (SUMMARY one-liners, requirement coverage, verification status).
audit-agents-skills
Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.
eval-skills
Audit all skills in the current project for frontmatter completeness, effort level appropriateness, allowed-tools scoping, and content quality. Produces a scored report with effort-level recommendations for each skill. Use when onboarding to a new project, reviewing skill quality before shipping, or adding effort…
eval-rules
Audit .claude/rules/ files for structural correctness, glob validity, and real-world usefulness. Resolves each paths: pattern against actual project files, then asks the user whether each rule is still relevant and useful. Can update rules in-place based on answers. Use when setting up rules for the first time…
review-pr
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request.
sonarqube
Analyze SonarCloud quality issues for a specific PR.