Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DonggangChen/antigravity-agentic-skills --skill langchain_patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DonggangChen/antigravity-agentic-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/donggangchen/antigravity-agentic-skills/langchain_patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/donggangchen/antigravity-agentic-skills/langchain_patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/donggangchen/antigravity-agentic-skills/langchain_patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/donggangchen/antigravity-agentic-skills/langchain_patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/donggangchen/antigravity-agentic-skills/langchain_patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02663 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01332 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00533 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
langchain_patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 397 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 4be9e35191ed
langchain_patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository DonggangChen/antigravity-agentic-skills (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,663 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
langchain_patterns
Implement Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems with LangChain4j. Build document ingestion pipelines, embedding stores, vector search strategies, and knowledge-enhanced AI applications. Use when creating question-answering systems over document collections or AI assistants with external knowledge bases.
langchain
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG…
llamaindex
Data framework for building LLM applications with RAG. Specializes in document ingestion (300+ connectors), indexing, and querying. Features vector indices, query engines, agents, and multi-modal support. Use for document Q&A, chatbots, knowledge retrieval, or building RAG pipelines. Best for data-centric LLM…
potpie-graph
Use when the task can read or write the project-memory graph through the potpie CLI: discover the contract with graph catalog, read named views with graph read, resolve entity identity with graph search-entities, create validated plans with graph propose, commit plans with graph commit --verify, inspect quality with…
potpie-source-ingestion
Use when the user explicitly asks to ingest, refresh, or deeply understand a repository, PR, issue, ticket, runbook, incident report, document, or web link into Potpie. The harness performs todo-driven discovery, uses local/GitHub/integration tools and read-only subagents when available, builds evidence-backed…
potpie-repo-baseline
Use when establishing, refreshing, or deeply understanding a repository's baseline memory in Potpie: purpose, application type, features, services/modules, environments, deploy shape, dependencies, API contracts, datastores, integrations, ownership, and explicit preferences. The harness reads authored and…