review-implementation-craft

review-implementation-craft is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator. It costs 10 tokens per session (933 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A read-only code review skill that checks code quality, such as naming, structure, error handling, and maintainability, within a multi-part review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review implementation changes or a completed feature and produce structured findings, suggestions, and a verdict in a markdown file.
Why use it?
It gives focused feedback on how understandable and maintainable the code is without changing files or running tests and tools.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review implementation changes or a completed feature and produce structured findings, suggestions, and a verdict in a markdown file.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator --skill review-implementation-craft
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-implementation-craft

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-implementation-craft

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/review-implementation-craft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 933 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.00933
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00466
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00187
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00093

Measured 10d ago against content hash a9fd45fdfb2b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-implementation-craft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-implementation-craft/SKILL.md · 64 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the Craft axis for a multi-axis implementation review. The harness may run you at either the per-phase implementation gate or the feature-level Final Review gate.

You run as a read-only, audit-only reviewer. Inspect the supplied plan or roadmap context, progress or prior feedback, verification evidence, and repository diff. Do not run commands, tests, builds, linters, or scripts. Audit only the files and evidence already produced by implementation.

Output Files

Artifact Path Requirement Purpose
review-feedback.md {helper_dir}/review-feedback.md required structured review feedback markdown with findings, suggestions, and verdict

Axis Scope

Own only intrinsic code quality:

  • naming clarity and local idiom
  • cohesion, simple design, and appropriate abstraction
  • contextual error handling
  • code structure that is understandable and maintainable
  • tests as code quality when their structure obscures behavior

Consult the relevant language guidelines and Knowledge Base before judging local conventions.

At the Final gate, judge Craft over the whole assembled feature and cumulative cross-repo diff. Do not limit review to a single implementation iteration.

Code Smells

Each smell reads what it ishow to fix; match it against the diff:

  • Mysterious Name — a function, variable, or type whose name doesn't reveal what it does or holds. → rename it; if no honest name comes, the design's murky.
  • Duplicated Code — the same logic shape appears in more than one hunk or file in the change. → extract the shared shape, call it from both.
  • Feature Envy — a method that reaches into another object's data more than its own. → move the method onto the data it envies.
  • Data Clumps — the same few fields or params keep travelling together (a type wanting to be born). → bundle them into one type, pass that.
  • Primitive Obsession — a primitive or string standing in for a domain concept that deserves its own type. → give the concept its own small type.
  • Repeated Switches — the same switch/if-cascade on the same type recurs across the change. → replace with polymorphism, or one map both sites share.
  • Shotgun Surgery — one logical change forces scattered edits across many files in the diff. → gather what changes together into one module.
  • Divergent Change — one file or module is edited for several unrelated reasons. → split so each module changes for one reason.
  • Speculative Generality — abstraction, parameters, or hooks added for needs the spec doesn't have. → delete it; inline back until a real need shows.
  • Dead or Unreachable Code — code introduced by the change has no execution path or caller, or can never run. → request its removal unless the supplied plan or roadmap explicitly requires keeping it.
  • Message Chains — long a.b().c().d() navigation the caller shouldn't depend on. → hide the walk behind one method on the first object.
  • Middle Man — a class or function that mostly just delegates onward. → cut it, call the real target direct.
  • Refused Bequest — a subclass or implementer that ignores or overrides most of what it inherits. → drop the inheritance, use composition.

Read the full file on GitHub · 64 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 64 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A a9fd45fdfb2b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-implementation-craft is a skill published in the GitHub repository doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator (103 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.