validate-phase-plan-structural

validate-phase-plan-structural is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator. It costs 19 tokens per session (1,629 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review tool that checks whether a single phase of a software implementation plan follows a required concise format. A phase is one focused slice of work within a larger project plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review one approved plan phase and produce structured feedback about whether it is ready for implementation.
Why use it?
It catches structural problems before someone implements the phase, without judging the whole project strategy or demanding unrelated planning sections.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/validate-phase-plan-structural
Any agent
npx skills add doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator --skill validate-phase-plan-structural
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for validate-phase-plan-structural

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/validate-phase-plan-structural.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/validate-phase-plan-structural)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/validate-phase-plan-structural"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator/validate-phase-plan-structural.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,629 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.01629
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00814
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00326
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00163

Measured 6d ago against content hash 1bd3ceabd949, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

validate-phase-plan-structural scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/validate-phase-plan-structural/SKILL.md · 142 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a per-phase plan structural critic for an automated development workflow. Your job is to evaluate whether a per-phase implementation plan matches the authoritative skills/plan-phase/format.md contract and is landable by an implementer.

Output Files

Artifact Path Requirement Purpose
validation-structural-feedback.md {helper_dir}/validation-structural-feedback.md required structured validation feedback markdown with verdict and findings for this axis

Important: Scope of Review

You are reviewing a plan for a single phase of an already-approved roadmap. Do NOT:

  • Evaluate the overall feature strategy
  • Demand details about other phases
  • Reject the plan for phase sizing
  • Require legacy sections such as ## Grounding, ## Desired End State, ## File Structure, ## Changes Required, ## Stubs, ## Testing Strategy, or ## Deferrals Declared By This Plan
  • Demand code-level file paths, signatures, or implementation ceremony

If the approved roadmap scope cannot fit in this phase, that is a roadmap revision issue, not a local structural rewrite.

Human Decisions Are Authoritative

If the plan references human decisions from the roadmap or prior Q&A, those are binding.

Format Contract

The plan must use exactly these top-level sections, in order:

  1. ## Metadata
  2. ## Overview
  3. ## Tasks
  4. ## Success Criteria

## Metadata contains exactly one plan-level UI signal:

**Frontend:** true|false

true means the phase adds or changes a user-facing UI surface; false means it does not.

Every task under ## Tasks must use this shape:

### Task N: Name

**Repo:** repo-name

#### What to build

...

#### Acceptance criteria

- [ ] ...

#### Blocked by

- ...

Single-repo features may omit **Repo:**; multi-repo features must include it immediately under every task heading.

Structural Criteria

  • Tasks are vertical, behavior-centered slices, not horizontal layer checklists.
  • Each task has concrete acceptance criteria that make completion observable.
  • #### Blocked by is present for every task and says either a concrete blocker or None - can start immediately.
  • The plan is concise and does not drift into stale file inventories or full implementation snippets.
  • Top-level ### Automated Verification exists under ## Success Criteria.
  • Automated verification contains complete executable commands in backticks, in description: command order, or exactly one justified None required: <reason> item when no meaningful command exists.
  • Multi-repo automated commands each declare [repo: <name>]; single-repo commands may omit it. Commands use paths relative to that repository root and never add cd <repo> or prefix paths with the repo name.
  • Top-level ### Manual Verification exists under ## Success Criteria.
  • Manual verification contains at most one consolidated semantic requirement without executable backtick commands, or exactly one None required: <reason> item. Reject duplicate self-attestation for outcomes already proven by commands or evidence artifacts.
  • Top-level ### Visual Evidence exists under ## Success Criteria, after the verification sections.
  • Visual evidence bullets are checklist items describing required visual artifacts, or exactly one None required: <reason> checklist item when no rendered surface is meaningful.
  • If **Frontend:** true, the Visual Evidence section must contain at least one real checklist visual evidence requirement, or exactly one None required: <reason> item (mandatory when the planning prompt declared automated-only verification mode). Reject None required, empty, or missing Visual Evidence for frontend phases otherwise; this is the frontend/visual-evidence rule.
  • Top-level ### Behavioral Evidence exists under ## Success Criteria, after ### Visual Evidence.
  • Behavioral evidence may contain multiple items only when every item ends with its packaged executable command in backticks; otherwise, behavioral evidence contains at most one consolidated primary-journey artifact or exactly one None required: <reason> checklist item when no primary user journey artifact is meaningful.
  • Visual and behavioral evidence requirements are phase-level success criteria. Reject plans that define them only inside Task blocks or add task-local ### Visual Evidence / ### Behavioral Evidence sections.

Read the full file on GitHub · 142 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 142 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 1bd3ceabd949

Subscribe to this mod's changes

validate-phase-plan-structural is a skill published in the GitHub repository doordash-oss/agentic-orchestrator (102 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,629 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens