browser-testing

A guide for writing and maintaining Playwright browser tests, which check how an application works in a real browser.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to test cross-part interactions, server-backed flows, streaming responses, layouts, keyboard shortcuts, and focus behavior.
Why use it?
It helps decide when a full browser check is needed instead of a smaller unit test, and provides consistent patterns for keeping those tests maintainable.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the flow plugin — 17 skills, 37 commands, 5 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing
Any agent
npx skills add dork-labs/dorkos --skill browser-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dork-labs/dorkos

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 17 skills, 37 commands, 5 agents.

Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,557 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00055 $0.02557
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01278
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00511
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00256

Measured 3d ago against content hash 0461246aebc5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

browser-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/browser-testing/SKILL.md · 224 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Browser Testing Methodology

1. When to Write a Browser Test vs Unit Test

Browser test (Playwright):

  • Cross-component flows (sidebar click updates chat panel)
  • SSE streaming verification (message send → streaming indicator → response rendered)
  • Real API calls through the full stack (client → Express → Agent SDK)
  • CSS/layout regressions visible only in a real browser
  • Browser-specific behavior (keyboard shortcuts, focus management)

Unit test (Vitest):

  • Individual component rendering and props
  • Hook logic and state transitions
  • Service functions and data transformations
  • Schema validation (Zod)
  • Pure utility functions

Rule of thumb: If the behavior spans multiple FSD layers or requires a real server, it's a browser test.

2. Page Object Model Patterns

POMs live in apps/e2e/pages/ and are injected as Playwright fixtures via fixtures/index.ts.

Each POM encapsulates locators and interaction methods for one page or component:

// apps/e2e/pages/FeaturePage.ts
import type { Page, Locator } from '@playwright/test';

export class FeaturePage {
  readonly page: Page;
  readonly primaryAction: Locator;

  constructor(page: Page) {
    this.page = page;
    this.primaryAction = page.getByRole('button', { name: /action/i });
  }

  async doAction() {
    await this.primaryAction.click();
  }
}

Register in fixtures:

// apps/e2e/fixtures/index.ts
import { test as base } from '@playwright/test';
import { FeaturePage } from '../pages/FeaturePage';

export const test = base.extend<{ featurePage: FeaturePage }>({
  featurePage: async ({ page }, use) => {
    await use(new FeaturePage(page));
  },
});

Test files import from fixtures, never from @playwright/test directly:

import { test, expect } from '../../fixtures';

3. Selector Strategy

Priority order:

  1. getByRole() — Best: semantic, resilient to UI changes

    page.getByRole('button', { name: /send/i });
    page.getByRole('textbox', { name: /message/i });
    page.getByRole('tab', { name: /settings/i });
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 224 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 224 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 0461246aebc5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

browser-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository dork-labs/dorkos (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,557 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.