Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dork-labs/dorkosnpx agentmods add skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/browser-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 126 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02775 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01110 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
browser-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Browser Testing Methodology
1. When to Write a Browser Test vs Unit Test
Browser test (Playwright):
- Cross-component flows (sidebar click updates chat panel)
- SSE streaming verification (message send → streaming indicator → response rendered)
- Real API calls through the full stack (client → Hono → Agent SDK)
- CSS/layout regressions visible only in a real browser
- Browser-specific behavior (keyboard shortcuts, focus management)
Unit test (Vitest):
- Individual component rendering and props
- Hook logic and state transitions
- Service functions and data transformations
- Schema validation (Zod)
- Pure utility functions
Rule of thumb: If the behavior spans multiple FSD layers or requires a real server, it's a browser test.
2. Page Object Model Patterns
POMs live in apps/e2e/pages/ and are injected as Playwright fixtures via fixtures/index.ts.
Each POM encapsulates locators and interaction methods for one page or component:
// apps/e2e/pages/FeaturePage.ts
import type { Page, Locator } from '@playwright/test';
export class FeaturePage {
readonly page: Page;
readonly primaryAction: Locator;
constructor(page: Page) {
this.page = page;
this.primaryAction = page.getByRole('button', { name: /action/i });
}
async doAction() {
await this.primaryAction.click();
}
}
Register in fixtures:
// apps/e2e/fixtures/index.ts
import { test as base } from '@playwright/test';
import { FeaturePage } from '../pages/FeaturePage';
export const test = base.extend<{ featurePage: FeaturePage }>({
featurePage: async ({ page }, use) => {
await use(new FeaturePage(page));
},
});
Test files import from fixtures, never from @playwright/test directly:
import { test, expect } from '../../fixtures';
3. Selector Strategy
Priority order:
-
getByRole()— Best: semantic, resilient to UI changespage.getByRole('button', { name: /send/i }); page.getByRole('textbox', { name: /message/i }); page.getByRole('tab', { name: /settings/i });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed 1d8381016267
- 20d ago Changed · -4 lines c631d68549b8
- 29d ago Changed · +1 lines bfba42216c13
- 1mo ago Changed 2940a7ee1380
- 1mo ago First seen · 224 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 0461246aebc5
browser-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository dork-labs/dorkos (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,775 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-reporting
Run the Level 2 dummy agent integration test suite and produce a detailed HTML report with per-test input → outcome analysis.
self-testing
E2E self-testing workflow for vibing.nvim using a separate Neovim instance controlled over RPC. Use when writing or debugging E2E tests, running npm run test:e2e, or executing the 3-try auto-fix rule after implementing a feature. Covers the…
test-design
Automatically design comprehensive E2E test cases for newly implemented vibing.nvim features. Use immediately after completing feature implementation (Phase 5.4) and before running E2E tests. Generates test scenarios covering Happy paths, Error cases, Edge cases, and Integration points with priority ranking…
add-integration-test
Use when a ticket asks for integration or end-to-end coverage across components — an API route hitting a database, a service-to-service call, a multi-step flow, file or database persistence, concurrent writers, crash recovery — rather than a single unit. Invoke for "test the endpoint end to end", "cover the checkout…
e2e-browser-test
Use when a ticket asks for end-to-end or browser coverage of a user journey — sign-up, checkout, a form submission, a dashboard flow — driven through the real UI with Playwright, Cypress, or the repo's browser harness. Invoke for "add an e2e test", "cover the flow in the browser", or when an acceptance criterion can…
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.