clarifying-requirements

clarifying-requirements is a skill for Claude Code from dork-labs/dorkos. It costs 45 tokens per session (1,389 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A prompt-checking guide that looks for missing details, ambiguous requirements, and hidden assumptions before implementation begins.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify gaps in a task and ask focused questions before coding.
Why use it?
It helps avoid building the wrong thing when a request lacks clear scope or success criteria.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the flow plugin — 32 skills, 43 commands, 5 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to identify gaps in a task and ask focused questions before coding.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add dork-labs/dorkos --skill clarifying-requirements
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dork-labs/dorkos

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 32 skills, 43 commands, 5 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for clarifying-requirements

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for clarifying-requirements

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dork-labs/dorkos/clarifying-requirements.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 45 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,389 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00045 $0.01389
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00694
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00278
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00139

Measured 6d ago against content hash 2f4feb5f58a6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

clarifying-requirements scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/clarifying-requirements/SKILL.md · 141 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Clarifying Requirements

Analyze user prompts for gaps, ambiguities, and unstated assumptions — then ask the questions the user failed to ask BEFORE beginning work.

Core Principle

Don't just answer what was asked — anticipate what SHOULD have been asked. Users often don't know what they don't know. Surface gaps in their thinking, unstated assumptions that could derail implementation, and scope ambiguities that lead to rework. The one test that matters: "Can I implement this without making assumptions?" If not, ask about the assumptions you'd have to make.

When to Apply

Activate proactive clarification when the request shows:

Signal Example Why It Matters
Vague action verbs "add", "improve", "fix" without specifics Undefined scope leads to wrong implementation
Missing constraints "make it faster" without metrics No way to know when you're done
Complexity underestimation "just add a button", "simple form", "quick" Often hides error/loading/permission states
Multiple features bundled "add X and Y and also Z" Scope creep, unclear priority
Goal without criteria "users should be able to..." No acceptance criteria
Assumed context "fix the bug" (which bug?), "like the other one" Missing reproduction steps / referent

Questioning Strategy

Do:

  • Limit to 2-4 questions — pick the highest-impact clarifications
  • Explain why each question matters ("This affects routing, state management, and URL structure")
  • Group related questions by theme (scope vs technical decisions)
  • Use AskUserQuestion for bounded choices — see Recommendation Discipline below

Read the full file on GitHub · 141 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 141 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 2f4feb5f58a6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

clarifying-requirements is a skill published in the GitHub repository dork-labs/dorkos (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,389 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.