Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dotlas/skills --skill cc-launch-workflowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dotlas/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotlas/skills/cc-launch-workflows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotlas/skills/cc-launch-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotlas/skills/cc-launch-workflows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotlas/skills/cc-launch-workflows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotlas/skills/cc-launch-workflows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01035 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00414 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
cc-launch-workflows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
After planning is complete and the user asks to execute, launch the plan as a background workflow of fresh Sonnet worker subagents, with the current agent (you) as orchestrator. If you do not have necessary context, you must launch “Explore” subagents to gather the required information before launching the workflow.
Ultracode: create a workflow based on the current active conversation’s plan. You are the manager / orchestrator and the subagents of the workflow are the workers.
Key Attributes of the workflow declaration:
- The model used for implementation must be Sonnet only, for every worker.
If you cannot guarantee Sonnet, you must resolve this with the user.
Every
agent()call in the workflow script must pass{ model: 'sonnet' }explicitly. The Workflow tool defaults each worker to the planning session’s model, so workers silently inherit that expensive model unless you override. This is the one place you deliberately ignore the default workflow tool’s “omit model” preset. Set an appropriate effort too. Look at the effort matrix below to decide per-worker effort levels.
| Worker Effort | Type of Problem | Example Use-Cases |
|---|---|---|
| medium | Pure mechanical changes. File locations, what code to add or change are all resolved already, and its just low cognitive effort to implement. | Add a new utility function, refactor a function, add a parameter to an endpoint, etc. When the worker doesn’t see more than 10 or so simple / small files. |
| high | Lower mechanical, higher cognitive load when making changes or adding code. | Adding a new endpoint, adding a new feature, creating a new table, etc. When the worker needs to know how the codebase is strung up so that it doesn’t trip any wiring. |
| xhigh | Mission critical workloads, or highly cognitive code changes that require presence and mindfulness. | Adding a new page, building a new notebook or subdir, adding code for authentication or authrorization / security workloads, etc. When the worker needs to seriously consider surfaces and blast radius without causing regressions. |
- The context must be fresh for each worker, and only relevant context should be passed to launch each worker. Common information that is required for all workers can be passed as a shared context or through a common file on disk.
- If each worker starts with needing to build context itself again, the prompt and context injected is not complete enough.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 0cbcb823c5f0
- 2mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 8c36b5e8779c
cc-launch-workflows is a skill published in the GitHub repository dotlas/skills (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,035 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
cc-launch-workflows compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cc-launch-workflowsdotlas/skills | Skill | 2 | 15d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| product-discoverytheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 242 | Claude Code |
| meta-prompt-optimizertheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 230 | Claude Code |
| product-strategytheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 216 | Claude Code |
| researchtheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 82 | Claude Code |
| ultraplantheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 101 | Claude Code |
| product-design-sharedtheagenticguy/erpaval | Skill | 28 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 135 | Claude Code |