Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dotnet/maui-labs --skill ci-validation-gatesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dotnet/maui-labsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/ci-validation-gates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/ci-validation-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/ci-validation-gates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/ci-validation-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/ci-validation-gates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00932 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
ci-validation-gates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ci-validation-gates — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
CI workflows must be defensive. These patterns were learned from the v0.8.22 release disaster where invalid semver, wrong token types, missing retry logic, and draft releases caused a multi-hour outage. Both Drucker (CI/CD) and Trejo (Release Manager) carried this knowledge in their charters — now centralized here.
Patterns
Semver Validation Gate
Every publish workflow MUST validate version format before npm publish. 4-part versions (e.g., 0.8.21.4) are NOT valid semver — npm mangles them.
- name: Validate semver
run: |
VERSION="${{ github.event.release.tag_name }}"
VERSION="${VERSION#v}"
if ! npx semver "$VERSION" > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "❌ Invalid semver: $VERSION"
echo "Only 3-part versions (X.Y.Z) or prerelease (X.Y.Z-tag.N) are valid."
exit 1
fi
echo "✅ Valid semver: $VERSION"
NPM Token Type Verification
NPM_TOKEN MUST be an Automation token, not a User token with 2FA:
- User tokens require OTP — CI can't provide it → EOTP error
- Create Automation tokens at npmjs.com → Settings → Access Tokens → Automation
- Verify before first publish in any workflow
Retry Logic for npm Registry Propagation
npm registry uses eventual consistency. After npm publish succeeds, the package may not be immediately queryable.
- Propagation: typically 5-30s, up to 2min in rare cases
- All verify steps: 5 attempts, 15-second intervals
- Log each attempt: "Attempt 1/5: Checking package..."
- Exit loop on success, fail after max attempts
- name: Verify package (with retry)
run: |
MAX_ATTEMPTS=5
WAIT_SECONDS=15
for attempt in $(seq 1 $MAX_ATTEMPTS); do
echo "Attempt $attempt/$MAX_ATTEMPTS: Checking $PACKAGE@$VERSION..."
if npm view "$PACKAGE@$VERSION" version > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "✅ Package verified"
exit 0
fi
[ $attempt -lt $MAX_ATTEMPTS ] && sleep $WAIT_SECONDS
done
echo "❌ Failed to verify after $MAX_ATTEMPTS attempts"
exit 1
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d0d5e86d56da
ci-validation-gates is a skill published in the GitHub repository dotnet/maui-labs (229 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 932 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ci-validation-gates, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ci-cd-patterns
CI/CD patterns for mobile - GitHub Actions workflows for Android/iOS, Fastlane integration, code signing, artifact publishing, and automated release.
ci-cd-patterns
CI/CD patterns for mobile - GitHub Actions workflows for Android/iOS, Fastlane integration, code signing, artifact publishing, and automated release.
argent-lens
Propose multiple visual design variants for on-screen elements and let the human pick in the Argent Lens window. Use when the user asks for design alternatives / options / A-B choices for a screen or component, or any time you have produced more than one candidate look for an element and want a human decision before…
argent-react-native-optimization
Optimizes a React Native app by profiling first to find real bottlenecks, then sweeping for mechanical issues. Entry-point for all performance work. Use when the app feels slow, user asks to optimize, fix re-renders, reduce jank, or improve startup. Delegates to argent-react-native-profiler for measurement.
mobile-automation
Control Android and iOS devices, emulators and simulators — launch apps, tap, swipe, type, take screenshots, read the accessibility tree. Use when a task involves a mobile device or app, mobile UI testing, or reproducing a bug on a phone.
simvyn
Operate iOS Simulators, Android Emulators, and connected mobile devices with Simvyn. Use for device discovery, app installation and launch, screenshots, logs, deep links, location simulation, app data inspection, device settings, and reusable device workflows through the Simvyn CLI or dashboard.