Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dotnet/maui-labs --skill humanizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dotnet/maui-labsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/humanizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/humanizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/humanizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/humanizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui-labs/humanizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.01005 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00402 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
humanizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to humanizer — 210 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
Use this skill whenever PAO drafts external-facing responses for issues or discussions.
- Tone must be warm, helpful, and human-sounding — never robotic or corporate.
- Brady's constraint applies everywhere: Humanized tone is mandatory.
- This applies to all external-facing content drafted by PAO in Phase 1 issues/discussions workflows.
Patterns
- Warm opening — Start with acknowledgment ("Thanks for reporting this", "Great question!")
- Active voice — "We're looking into this" not "This is being investigated"
- Second person — Address the person directly ("you" not "the user")
- Conversational connectors — "That said...", "Here's what we found...", "Quick note:"
- Specific, not vague — "This affects the casting module in v0.8.x" not "We are aware of issues"
- Empathy markers — "I can see how that would be frustrating", "Good catch!"
- Action-oriented closes — "Let us know if that helps!" not "Please advise if further assistance is required"
- Uncertainty is OK — "We're not 100% sure yet, but here's what we think is happening..." is better than false confidence
- Profanity filter — Never include profanity, slurs, or aggressive language, even when quoting
- Baseline comparison — Responses should align with tone of 5-10 "gold standard" responses (>80% similarity threshold)
- Empathetic disagreement — "We hear you. That's a fair concern." before explaining the reasoning
- Information request — Ask for specific details, not open-ended "can you provide more info?"
- No link-dumping — Don't just paste URLs. Provide context: "Check out the getting started guide — specifically the section on routing" not just a bare link
Examples
1. Welcome
Hey {author}! Welcome to Squad 👋 Thanks for opening this.
{substantive response}
Let us know if you have questions — happy to help!
2. Troubleshooting
Thanks for the detailed report, {author}!
Here's what we think is happening: {explanation}
{steps or workaround}
Let us know if that helps, or if you're seeing something different.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 944d6d69a671
humanizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository dotnet/maui-labs (229 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,005 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to humanizer, differing in 210 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
argent-settings-permissions
Grant, deny, or reset an app's runtime permissions (camera, microphone, photos, contacts, notifications, calendar, location, location-always, media-library, motion, reminders) on an iOS simulator or Android device using the argent settings-permissions tool - without navigating the system Settings UI. Use when the…
argent-lens
Propose multiple visual design variants for on-screen elements and let the human pick in the Argent Lens window. Use when the user asks for design alternatives / options / A-B choices for a screen or component, or any time you have produced more than one candidate look for an element and want a human decision before…
argent-react-native-optimization
Optimizes a React Native app by profiling first to find real bottlenecks, then sweeping for mechanical issues. Entry-point for all performance work. Use when the app feels slow, user asks to optimize, fix re-renders, reduce jank, or improve startup. Delegates to argent-react-native-profiler for measurement.
mobile-automation
Control Android and iOS devices, emulators and simulators — launch apps, tap, swipe, type, take screenshots, read the accessibility tree. Use when a task involves a mobile device or app, mobile UI testing, or reproducing a bug on a phone.
argent-tv-interact
Control and inspect TV apps via argent, Apple TV (tvOS), Android TV (leanback), and Amazon Fire TV (Vega). Boot the target, read focus, navigate with the D-pad remote, type, screenshot, and on Vega debug the JS runtime (evaluate, console logs, network inspector). Use when a task targets a TV (runtimeKind "tv", or…
simvyn
Operate iOS Simulators, Android Emulators, and connected mobile devices with Simvyn. Use for device discovery, app installation and launch, screenshots, logs, deep links, location simulation, app data inspection, device settings, and reusable device workflows through the Simvyn CLI or dashboard.