.NET MAUI is a C# and XAML framework for building native mobile and desktop applications from one shared codebase. Developers use it to create apps for Android, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and Windows. The catalogue entries provide skills, instructions, and agents for working with .NET MAUI.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dotnet/maui/agentic-labelernpx skills add dotnet/maui --skill agentic-labelergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dotnet/mauiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui/agentic-labeler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui/agentic-labeler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui/agentic-labeler.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.03410 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01705 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00682 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00341 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-labeler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Labeler
Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth for how issues and PRs should be labeled. They are consumed by the agentic-labeler gh-aw workflow and can also be used standalone for batch evaluation or interactive labeling.
🚨 Scope: area-* and platform/* ONLY
The labeler applies only two label families, and nothing else:
- Exactly one
area-*— derived from the subject matter (control name, area like layout / navigation / xaml / infrastructure / etc.). Choose the single most specific match for the dominant subsystem; see the tie-breaking rules below. - One or more
platform/*— derived from changed-file platform conventions on PRs, or from explicit platform mentions on issues. Apply all that fit. Exception:platform/tizenis never applied by this labeler under any circumstance, even when Tizen files are touched or Tizen is named in an issue (see the platform-label rules below).
The labeler must NOT apply any other label, ever. Specifically, do not apply:
t/*(kind:t/bug,t/enhancement ☀️,t/docs 📝,t/breaking 💥,t/native-embedding,t/desktop,t/a11y, etc.) — the issue/PR author or other automation owns these.i/*(indicators:i/regression, etc.) — set during triage based on investigation, not initial content.s/*(status:s/needs-info,s/needs-repro,s/needs-verification,s/needs-attention,s/triaged,s/verified,s/no-repro,s/not-a-bug,s/duplicate 2️⃣,s/pr-needs-author-input, etc.) — managed bydotnet-policy-service[bot]and human triagers.p/*(priority:p/0,p/1,p/2,p/3) — set by maintainers.partner/*(e.g.,partner/syncfusion) — set by partner-tracking automation.perf/*(e.g.,perf/memory-leak 💦) — set during perf investigation.backport/*,regressed-in-*,version/*— set during triage / release management.untriaged,:watch: Not Triaged— applied by repo automation on issue open.- Anything else that is not literally an
area-*orplatform/*label.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 134 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A d0497d03cdac
agentic-labeler is a skill published in the GitHub repository dotnet/maui (23,319 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 3,410 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dpg-migration
Migration logic for Azure SDK for .NET data-plane libraries migrating from AutoRest/Swagger to TypeSpec-based generation. Uses MCP tools from the generator-agent server for automated deterministic fixes.
csharp-azure-spector-coverage-gaps
Discovers and implements gaps in Spector test coverage for the Azure C# HTTP client emitter. Use when asked to find missing Spector scenarios, add Spector test coverage, or implement a specific Spector spec for the Azure C# emitter. Can also compare coverage between the Azure dashboard and the Standard (TypeSpec core)…
auto-build-repair
Headless, bounded repair of custom-code build failures in an already-generated Azure SDK PR. Thin wrapper over the shared azure-sdk-mcp:azsdkcustomizedcodeupdate engine in custom-code-only scope (editScope: CustomCode); the skill owns the iterate-until-green loop, capped by a per-language maxIterations read from…
azure-sdk-mgmt-pr-review
Review Azure SDK management-plane pull requests, check naming conventions, API compatibility, and code quality.
mgmt-review-comment-resolution
Resolve review comments on Azure management-plane .NET SDK PRs. Handles renaming types/properties, changing property types, and other API surface adjustments by updating TypeSpec client.tsp and regenerating.
mitigate-breaking-changes
Patterns and techniques for mitigating breaking changes in Azure management-plane SDKs. Covers SDK-side customizations (partial classes, CodeGenType, CodeGenSuppress) and TypeSpec decorator customizations (clientName, access, markAsPageable, alternateType, hierarchyBuilding).