repo-dev-check

A repository self-check for Flow2Spec development. It reviews uncommitted changes to see whether files were edited in the correct place: the project configuration or reusable templates.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before committing Flow2Spec development work, especially when changing skills, rules, templates, or configuration files.
Why use it?
It helps catch changes that would be distributed to other projects by mistake, or project-only changes that were put into shared templates. It also points to the required correction.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/double-coding-lab/flow2spec/repo-dev-check
Any agent
npx skills add double-coding-lab/Flow2Spec --skill repo-dev-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/double-coding-lab/Flow2Spec

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 89 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,905 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00089 $0.01905
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00953
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00381
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00191

Measured 2d ago against content hash a6670c1d794f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

repo-dev-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.claude/skills/repo-dev-check/SKILL.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

repo-dev-check(本仓开发纪律自查)

适用:仅在 Flow2Spec 本仓自身开发时启用。下游项目不会拿到本 SKILL——它只存在于本仓的 .claude/skills/.cursor/skills/.codex/skills/,从不进 templates/

单一事实源:本 SKILL 依据 f2s-dev-workflow-constraints 规则执行(Claude:.claude/rules/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.md;Cursor:.cursor/rules/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.mdc;Codex:.codex/topics/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.md)。步骤 0 必须 Read 该规则全文。

触发场景

  • 用户显式说「跑 dev-workflow 自查 / 检查是不是改错地方了」;
  • 用户在 Flow2Spec 本仓内、Agent 即将提交前主动自查;
  • Agent 发现自己刚做了配置根下的 Edit / Write,须补做本自查;
  • Agent 在改开发纪律相关的规则 / skill / topic 时(比如本文件、f2s-dev-workflow-constraints)。

不触发:下游项目内、纯业务代码修改无 template/config-root 交集时。

前置

步骤 0Read .claude/rules/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.md(Cursor:.cursor/rules/*.mdc;Codex:.codex/topics/*.md)全文。不 Read 直接开跑属违规

编排

  • 主 agent 通篇执行:本 skill 无重 IO 操作,无需拆子。
  • 配置:不受 flow2spec.config.json.subAgent 约束(无论 true / false 都主 agent 跑)。
  • 写权:本 skill 主动落盘业务文件;只做判定 + 建议;确实需要写盘时逐条回到具体 skill(如 f2s-git-commit)流程。

步骤

步骤 1:git 摸底

  1. Bashgit status -s | grep -v DS_Store 列出所有未提交改动。

步骤 2:写盘边界判定(对每份 pending 文件)

对步骤 1 列出的每一份改动文件,套下表判定:

文件路径模式 是否合规 判定依据
templates/zh-CN/**templates/en-US/** ✅ 合规 生产侧唯一入口
docs/** / lib/** / cli.js / scripts/** / package.json ✅ 合规 包源码
.Knowledge/** ✅ 合规 本仓自身知识库
.claude/rules/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.md ✅ 合规 本仓专属手写规则(templates 无对应源)
.claude/skills/repo-dev-check/** ✅ 合规 本仓专属手写 skill(templates 无对应源)
.cursor/rules/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.mdc ✅ 合规 同上(Cursor 端)
.cursor/skills/repo-dev-check/** ✅ 合规 同上
.codex/topics/repo-dev-workflow-constraints.md ✅ 合规 同上(Codex 端)
.codex/skills/repo-dev-check/** ✅ 合规 同上
.claude/rules/<其它>.md / .cursor/rules/<其它>.mdc / .codex/topics/<其它>.md ❌ 违规 有 templates 对应源 → 应改 templates/{zh-CN,en-US}/rules/<其它>.md
.claude/skills/<其它>/** / .cursor/skills/<其它>/** / .codex/skills/<其它>/** ❌ 违规 有 templates 对应源 → 应改 templates/{zh-CN,en-US}/skills/<其它>/SKILL.md
AGENTS.md ❌ 违规 buildCodexAgentsMd(templatesDir, ...) 从 templates 拼装 → 应改 templates/{zh-CN,en-US}/AGENTS.md
.claude/hooks/** / .cursor/hooks/** / .codex/hooks/** / .claude/settings.json / .cursor/hooks.json / .codex/hooks.json ❌ 违规 init 产物 → 需求要改的话改 lib/init.jstemplates/
packages/core/templates/** ❌ 违规 scripts/sync-core-templates.js 从根 templates/ 自动生成,已进 .gitignore → 想改模板应改根 templates/,同步靠脚本
.claude/memory/** / LOCAL_CONTEXT.md ⚠️ 本地态 不入库,不受约束(但提醒别 commit)

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 102 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A a6670c1d794f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

repo-dev-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository double-coding-lab/Flow2Spec (47 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,905 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens