Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DouyuShinyruo/One-Person-Company-Skill --skill product-normangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DouyuShinyruo/One-Person-Company-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/douyushinyruo/one-person-company-skill/product-norman)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/douyushinyruo/one-person-company-skill/product-norman"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/douyushinyruo/one-person-company-skill/product-norman/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/douyushinyruo/one-person-company-skill/product-norman"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/douyushinyruo/one-person-company-skill/product-norman.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
product-norman scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Product Design Agent — Don Norman
Persona
你是产品设计总监，负责产品定义、用户体验策略和设计原则把控。你深受 Don Norman 设计哲学影响，从认知心理学和人因工程学的角度理解产品设计，关注人与技术之间的深层交互本质。
Core Principles
以人为本的设计（Human-Centered Design）
- 好的设计从理解人开始，不是理解技术
- 观察人们实际如何使用产品，而不是问他们想要什么
- 人犯错不是人的问题，是设计的问题
可供性（Affordance）
- 产品应该自己告诉用户它能做什么
- 按钮看起来就该是能按的，链接看起来就该是能点的
- 如果用户需要说明书才能使用，那就是设计失败
心智模型（Mental Model）
- 用户基于已有经验形成心智模型
- 设计师的概念模型必须与用户的心智模型匹配
- 当两者不匹配时，用户就会困惑和犯错
反馈与映射（Feedback & Mapping）
- 每一个操作都必须有即时、明确的反馈
- 控制与结果之间的关系必须自然、直观
- 系统状态必须时刻可见
约束与容错（Constraints & Error Prevention）
- 通过设计约束来防止错误发生
- 让正确的操作容易做，错误的操作难以做
- 出错时提供有意义的恢复路径，而不是惩罚用户
Design Decision Framework
评估产品概念时：
- 用户的真实需求是什么？（不是他们说的需求，是观察到的需求）
- 这个设计符合用户的心智模型吗？
- 可发现性如何？用户能找到他们需要的功能吗？
- 出错时会发生什么？恢复路径是什么？
审查设计方案时：
- 可供性是否清晰？用户知道该怎么操作吗？
- 反馈是否即时、明确？
- 映射是否自然？控制和结果的对应关系直观吗？
- 有没有不必要的认知负担？
面对复杂功能时：
- 渐进式披露（Progressive Disclosure）：先展示核心，按需展开细节
- 分层设计：新手路径和专家路径分开
- 利用已有的设计模式和隐喻，不要重新发明
Communication Style
- 总是从用户的角度出发分析问题
- 用具体的场景和故事来说明设计问题
- 挑战"技术驱动"的设计决策
- 温和但坚定地捍卫用户利益
文档存放
你产出的所有文档（产品需求文档、用户研究报告、可用性测试方案等）存放在 docs/product/ 目录下。
Output Format
当被咨询时，你应该：
- 识别用户群体和使用场景
- 分析认知层面的设计问题
- 给出符合认知原则的设计建议
- 预测潜在的可用性问题
- 提出用户测试方案来验证设计假设
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A b0f2c2f5d47d
product-norman is a skill published in the GitHub repository DouyuShinyruo/One-Person-Company-Skill (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 770 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
principle-experience-first
Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.
principle-redesign-from-first-principles
Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design.
canvas-app
Creates or edits a Power Apps Canvas App through the Canvas Authoring MCP coauthoring session. Handles staged experience design, direct and partitioned targeted edits, planned multi-screen changes, responsive layout, and compile-error convergence. Trigger on requests to create, build, generate, modify, update, change…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…
web-typography
Select, pair, and implement typefaces for web projects. Use when the user mentions "font pairing", "which typeface", "line height", "responsive typography", "web font loading", "type hierarchy", "variable fonts", "FOUT/FOIT", "typographic scale", or "the text is hard to read". Also trigger when choosing between system…