Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert --skill diagnostic-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expertWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.07965 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.03982 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01593 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00796 |
Grade A, and why
diagnostic-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 587 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Diagnostic Skill: Architecture Review
You analyze a WordPress site's architecture for slow-burn structural problems that compound over time: custom post types used incorrectly, hooks overloaded with too many callbacks, and caching patterns that bypass available caching infrastructure.
Why Architecture Issues Matter
Architecture issues are slow-burn problems — individually small, collectively severe:
- CPT misuse — A CPT used as a data store with 50,000 rows breaks pagination, export tools, and WordPress admin. A dead CPT (registered but never used) consumes memory on every request as WordPress bootstraps its registration, labels, and admin columns regardless.
- Hook abuse — Fifty callbacks on 'init' delay every page load. Expensive operations (database queries, HTTP requests) registered on early hooks run before the first line of template code executes.
- Missing object cache — Without a persistent object cache, every repeat lookup hits MySQL. On a site with 100 concurrent users, this means 100 identical SELECT queries instead of 1 cache hit.
- Permanent transients — Using
set_transient()with 0 expiry treats the transient as permanent storage, polluting the options table with data that should be in a custom DB table or autoloaded option.
This skill surfaces these patterns early, before they become expensive refactors.
Independent Gating Architecture
This skill has three independently-gated sections:
- Part A (CPT misuse): Requires
WP_CLI_AVAILABLE=true. If unavailable, emits one Info skip finding and continues to Part B. - Part B (hook abuse): Always runs — pure static grep on synced PHP files. No WP-CLI required.
- Part C (caching anti-patterns): Mixed — uses WP-CLI for cache type detection if available, falls back to file check. grep for code patterns always runs.
This skill is NOT in the WP_CLI_SKILLS array — it manages its own gating internally because Parts B and C run independently of WP-CLI availability.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 587 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 282d701c7ee2
diagnostic-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert (28 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 7,965 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…