Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert --skill diagnostic-code-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expertWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert/diagnostic-code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.03793 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00759 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00379 |
Grade A, and why
diagnostic-code-quality scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s "https://api.wordpress.org/plugins/info/1.2/?action=plugin_information&request[slug]={dirname}" | grep -q '"error"' How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 469 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WordPress Code Quality Diagnostic Skill
This skill performs comprehensive code quality analysis on custom WordPress code using a tiered approach to maximize efficiency while providing deep, actionable insights.
Analysis Scope
Analyze: Active theme + custom (non-WP.org) plugins only Skip: Core WordPress files and plugins from the WordPress.org repository (version audit handles those)
Section 1: Target Selection
Before analysis, determine which code to scan based on the connected WordPress site.
Step 1.1: Identify Active Theme
Get the active theme (parent) and child theme if applicable:
# Get active parent theme
ssh {user}@{host} "cd {wp_path} && {wp_cli_path} option get template"
# Get active stylesheet (child theme if different from template)
ssh {user}@{host} "cd {wp_path} && {wp_cli_path} option get stylesheet"
Scan targets: All PHP and JS files in:
.sites/{site-name}/wp-content/themes/{template}/(parent theme).sites/{site-name}/wp-content/themes/{stylesheet}/(child theme if different)
Step 1.2: Identify Custom Plugins
For each plugin directory in .sites/{site-name}/wp-content/plugins/, determine if it's a custom plugin or from WordPress.org:
WP.org Plugin Detection Heuristic:
- Check if
readme.txtexists with "Stable tag:" header - Verify the slug exists on WordPress.org API:
curl -s "https://api.wordpress.org/plugins/info/1.2/?action=plugin_information&request[slug]={dirname}" | grep -q '"error"' - If API returns error (not found on WP.org) = CUSTOM PLUGIN → Do full code analysis
- If API returns plugin info = WP.org plugin → SKIP code analysis (version audit handles this)
Alternative: Check plugin headers for "Plugin URI" pointing to wordpress.org domains
Step 1.3: List Scan Targets
Before proceeding, output a list of all selected targets:
Code Quality Scan Targets:
- Theme: {theme-name} ({file-count} files)
- Child Theme: {child-theme-name} ({file-count} files) [if applicable]
- Custom Plugins:
- {plugin-1-name} ({file-count} files)
- {plugin-2-name} ({file-count} files)
Total scan targets: {N} files across {M} directories
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 469 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A c76e3692941e
diagnostic-code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository dr-robert-li/cowork-wordpress-expert (28 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,793 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…