Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add drafthq/draft --skill opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drafthq/draftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00546 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ops - Operations & Lifecycle Router
/draft:ops groups all operational, deployment, and runtime lifecycle commands.
When to Use
- Preparing a deployment or release
- Responding to incidents or outages
- Generating team standup / activity summaries
- Checking overall project or track status
- Performing git-aware reverts or rollbacks
Routing Logic
Intent keywords drive deterministic dispatch. Multi-intent requests are sequenced (e.g., status then incident).
| User Intent Keywords | Dispatches To | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| upload for review, git upload, submit code, open PR | /draft:upload |
Pre-upload gate: review, approvals, validators, then push |
| deploy checklist, pre-deploy, release check, readiness | /draft:deploy-checklist |
Pre-deployment verification with rollback triggers |
| incident, outage, sev, postmortem, triage | /draft:incident-response |
Full incident lifecycle (triage → mitigate → postmortem) |
| standup, daily summary, what did I do, activity report | /draft:standup |
Git activity standup summary (read-only) |
| status, progress, what's the state, track overview | /draft:status |
Progress overview across tracks and git |
| revert, rollback, undo, git revert, restore | /draft:revert |
Git-aware safe rollback of changes or tracks |
Dispatch Examples
User: "run the deploy checklist for the auth track"
→ dispatches to /draft:deploy-checklist [track auth]
User: "we had an outage last night, start postmortem"
→ dispatches to /draft:incident-response postmortem
User: "give me today's standup"
→ dispatches to /draft:standup
User: "what's the current status of the project"
→ dispatches to /draft:status
User: "revert the last two commits on this branch safely"
→ dispatches to /draft:revert
Integration Notes
Ops commands often read draft/tracks.md, draft/*/plan.md, and git metadata. They feed forward into documentation and jira flows when needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A d315a3d0f2fd
ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository drafthq/draft (40 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 546 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
skill-creator
Trigger: new skills, agent instructions, documenting AI usage patterns. Create LLM-first skills with valid frontmatter.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.