Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add drafthq/draft --skill tourgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drafthq/draftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/tour)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/tour"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/tour/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/tour"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/tour.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00259 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
tour scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 40 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Draft Tour: Interactive Onboarding
Provide an interactive codebase walk-through based on existing architecture and guardrail constraints.
Red Flags - STOP if you're
- Dumping the entire
architecture.mdinto the chat window. - Giving answers to foundational pattern questions before prompting the developer to guess.
- Explaining code the developer hasn't explicitly asked to view yet.
Execution Constraints
- Load Context: Read
draft/architecture.md,draft/tech-stack.md, anddraft/guardrails.md. - Interactive Cadence: Ask the developer if they are familiar with the tech stack constraints found in
draft/tech-stack.md. - Module Introduction: Instead of listing all modules, introduce the "Entry Point" module first.
- Active Challenge: After explaining a module's responsibility, challenge the developer: "Based on our Context-Driven Development rules, how do you think we handle data persistence here?" Wait for their answer before revealing the architecture strategy.
- If the answer is correct, confirm briefly and cite the supporting line in
architecture.md/guardrails.md. - If the answer is partially right, name what they got right, then ask a narrower follow-up (e.g., "Right that we cache reads — what's the invalidation trigger?") before revealing the rest.
- If the answer is wrong, do not just hand them the answer. Quote the specific guardrail or HLD section that contradicts it, then re-prompt with a hint scoped to that section.
- If the answer is correct, confirm briefly and cite the supporting line in
- Traceability: Highlight
draft/.state/facts.jsonshowing how module constraints have evolved. - Track Lifecycle Walk: Show the full feature lifecycle and who owns each gate:
/draft:new-track→spec.md(requirements + classification + approvers) +plan.md(phases/tasks)/draft:decompose→hld.md(always, with graph-derived diagrams) +lld.md(when --lld or High-complexity module)- Approvers (HLD): Technical Leads, Architecture Review Board, Cloud Operations (SaaS), QA Leads (on-prem), PM Leads
- Approvers (LLD): Team Leads, Technical Leads, Quality Assurance
/draft:implement→ TDD loop reading lld.md/hld.md for stub generation/draft:upload→ blocksgit uploadfor high/mission-critical tracks until HLD §Approvals signed/draft:deploy-checklist→ blocks deploy until HLD §Checklist + LLD §Alerting Thresholds populated- Walk a real example track from
draft/tracks/if any exist; otherwise sketch a hypothetical low-criticality flow.
- Completion: Guide the developer to create their first test track using
/draft:new-trackso they understand the artifact loop end-to-end.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d9fd9532ba6e
tour is a skill published in the GitHub repository drafthq/draft (40 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 647 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
skill-creator
Trigger: new skills, agent instructions, documenting AI usage patterns. Create LLM-first skills with valid frontmatter.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
cognitive-doc-design
Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.