Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add drag88/claude-dev-framework --skill failure-recoverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drag88/claude-dev-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drag88/claude-dev-framework/failure-recovery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drag88/claude-dev-framework/failure-recovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drag88/claude-dev-framework/failure-recovery.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00877 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
failure-recovery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Failure Recovery Skill
Protocol for handling consecutive failures to prevent thrashing and wasted effort.
When to Activate
- Same operation fails 3 times consecutively
- Different approaches to the same problem all fail
- Test suite keeps failing after multiple fix attempts
- Build errors persist after several corrections
- Search queries return no useful results repeatedly
Three-Failure Protocol
After 3 consecutive failures on the same objective:
STOP → REVERT → DOCUMENT → CONSULT
1. STOP
Immediately halt the current approach. Do not:
- Try "one more variation"
- Make additional speculative changes
- Continue down the failing path
2. REVERT
Restore to last known good state:
# If changes were made to files
git checkout -- <affected-files>
# If in middle of complex operation
git stash
# If commits were made
git reset --soft HEAD~N # where N = number of bad commits
3. DOCUMENT
Create a failure record:
## Failure Record: [Brief Description]
**Objective**: What was being attempted
**Attempts**:
1. [First approach] → [Why it failed]
2. [Second approach] → [Why it failed]
3. [Third approach] → [Why it failed]
**Observations**:
- [Pattern noticed across failures]
- [Unexpected behavior]
- [Missing information]
**Hypotheses**:
- [What might actually be wrong]
- [What assumptions might be incorrect]
4. CONSULT
Ask the user for guidance:
I've attempted this 3 times without success:
**Goal**: [What I was trying to do]
**Approaches tried**:
1. [Approach 1]: [Result]
2. [Approach 2]: [Result]
3. [Approach 3]: [Result]
**What I think might be happening**:
[Hypothesis]
**Options**:
1. [Alternative approach A]
2. [Alternative approach B]
3. [Ask for more context about X]
Which would you like me to try, or do you have other suggestions?
Failure Categories
Build/Compile Failures
- Check for missing dependencies
- Verify environment setup
- Look for version mismatches
- Check import paths
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 174 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A aa944ed07ac2
failure-recovery is a skill published in the GitHub repository drag88/claude-dev-framework (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 877 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…