Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/dragoon-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.00347 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00173 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/qa
Scaffolds a playwright e2e test suite tuned to the codebase.
When to use
- The user wants to add e2e tests
- "Set up smoke tests", "scaffold playwright", "browser tests"
- Before a launch, when there are no e2e tests yet
What it writes
playwright.config.tsconfigured with the right baseURL for the detected stack (Next.js → 3000, SvelteKit → 5173, etc.)tests/e2e/smoke.spec.tswith 4 tests: page loads with title, h1 visible, no console errors, no broken imagestests/e2e/run.shrunner that installs@playwright/testand Chromium on first run
Dragoon does not install playwright or browsers. The runner script does that on first run.
Run it
dragoon qa # preview
dragoon qa --apply # write
Then
npm i -D @playwright/test
bash tests/e2e/run.sh
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 38 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 71cf2ed0a01b
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/dragoon-skills (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 347 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-e2e
End-to-end testing patterns with Playwright — page objects, AI agent testing, visual regression, accessibility testing with axe-core, and CI integration. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up Playwright, implementing visual regression, or testing accessibility.
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.
Axe-core Accessibility Testing
Accessibility testing skill using axe-core and Playwright for automated WCAG 2.1 compliance auditing, custom rules, and accessibility reporting.
browser-inspection-workflow
Coordinate rendered behavior and state evidence.
visual-regression-lab
Compare captures; stitch lazy/animated pages.
cross-browser-qa
Verify browser-engine compatibility.