Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/dragoon-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.00347 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/qa
Scaffolds a playwright e2e test suite tuned to the codebase.
When to use
- The user wants to add e2e tests
- "Set up smoke tests", "scaffold playwright", "browser tests"
- Before a launch, when there are no e2e tests yet
What it writes
playwright.config.tsconfigured with the right baseURL for the detected stack (Next.js → 3000, SvelteKit → 5173, etc.)tests/e2e/smoke.spec.tswith 4 tests: page loads with title, h1 visible, no console errors, no broken imagestests/e2e/run.shrunner that installs@playwright/testand Chromium on first run
Dragoon does not install playwright or browsers. The runner script does that on first run.
Run it
dragoon qa # preview
dragoon qa --apply # write
Then
npm i -D @playwright/test
bash tests/e2e/run.sh
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 71cf2ed0a01b
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/dragoon-skills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 347 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.
a11y-ally
Use when running comprehensive WCAG accessibility audits with axe-core + pa11y + Lighthouse, generating context-aware remediation, or testing video accessibility. Supports 3-tier browser cascade with graceful degradation.
accessibility-testing
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
kb-github-a11y-scanner
Reference data, not a reviewer. Integrate GitHub Accessibility Scanner. Detects configuration, parses scanner issues, correlates with local scans, and tracks Copilot-assigned fixes.
kb-playwright-testing
Reference data, not a reviewer. Browser accessibility testing using Playwright and @axe-core/playwright. Keyboard scans, contrast verification, and accessibility tree snapshots.
testing-coach
How to test: screen readers, keyboard passes, automated checks and CI.