Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dragoon0x/dragoon-skills --skill shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/dragoon-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/dragoon-skills/ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ship
Pre-PR check orchestrator. The thing you run before pushing.
When to use
- Before opening a pull request
- The user says "ship", "open a PR", "ready to merge"
- As a CI step that gates merges
What it does
- Loads (or generates)
dragoon.json - Runs /critique and fails if overall < threshold (default 80)
- Runs /slop and fails on any high-severity finding
- Detects git state (branch, changed files, remote)
- Builds a PR description from the run results
- If
--openandghCLI is available, opens the PR
Run it
dragoon ship # all checks, preview PR body
dragoon ship --threshold 85 # tighter design gate
dragoon ship --title "add invites" --open # actually open the PR
dragoon ship --json # for CI
Safety
- The PR title is sanitized before passing to the shell
- The PR body is written to a temp file (
--body-file), never inlined as argv --openonly runs if all checks pass; pass--skip-critique/--skip-slopto bypass
Exit codes
0all checks passed1one or more checks failed2bad usage
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A d646e89dd1d4
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/dragoon-skills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Review pull requests: diffs, comments, context and written review docs.
secret-scan
Scan the working tree or changed files for hardcoded secrets — API keys, tokens, private keys, connection strings, cloud credentials — across common providers. Reports file:line with the masked match. Pure Claude Code, no signup.
engineering-standards
Team engineering practice — code conventions and readability, git and branching workflow, commit and pull request hygiene, code review standards, architecture decision records, documentation and runbooks, onboarding, developer experience, and managing technical debt deliberately. Use when the user says "code review"…
release-readiness
The go/no-go gate before shipping — a structured launch checklist across security, data, legal, operations, performance, accessibility and rollback, producing an explicit ship or do-not-ship decision with named blockers. Use when the user says "ready to launch", "go live", "ship it", "pre-launch", "launch checklist"…
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.