Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/android-design-patternsnpx skills add Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste --skill android-design-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/android-design-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/android-design-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/android-design-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00254 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
android-design-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Android Design Patterns
Material Design 3
- Dynamic color: Color scheme derived from user's wallpaper.
- Elevated surfaces: Tonal elevation (color shift, not just shadow).
- Large touch targets: 48dp minimum.
Navigation
- Bottom navigation bar (3-5 destinations).
- Navigation drawer for 5+ destinations.
- Top app bar: title + actions + navigation icon.
- FAB (Floating Action Button) for primary creation action.
Components
- Cards with rounded corners (12dp radius).
- Chips for filters and selections.
- Bottom sheets for secondary actions.
- Snackbars for brief feedback (bottom of screen).
Typography
- Roboto as system font (or product-specific typeface).
- Type scale: Display, Headline, Title, Body, Label.
Key Differences from iOS
- Back button in navigation bar (not edge swipe).
- FAB for primary action (iOS uses nav bar buttons).
- Bottom sheets more common than action sheets.
- Hardware back button support.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 34 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 56876b5d7a71
android-design-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 254 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
iOS SwiftUI Accessibility
Enforces WCAG 2.2 accessible coding patterns when writing SwiftUI — labels, traits, Dynamic Type, contrast, touch targets, focus management, orientation, and more. Based on the ios-swiftui-accessibility-techniques project with 41 static analysis rules across 23 WCAG criteria.
android-design
Use when the user asks for an Android app, Compose UI, Material 3, Material You, Material 3 Expressive, Pixel-style app, foldable/adaptive layout, Play Store deliverable, React Native Android, Flutter Android, Compose Multiplatform, or any Android deliverable. Builds Android apps across system-like Compose, branded…
apple-design
Use when the user asks for SwiftUI, UIKit, AppKit, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, Liquid Glass, HIG, SF Symbols, App Store deliverables, Apple settings/forms, branded Apple apps, React Native iOS, Flutter Cupertino, or Electron/Tauri macOS shells. Builds Apple-platform apps across system-like SwiftUI, branded…
cross-platform-design
Use when the user wants one codebase or one product design across web, iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac, asks for the same app on all platforms, asks to translate/port a UI between platforms, or names Compose Multiplatform, Tauri 2, Electron, React Native, Flutter, .NET MAUI, Avalonia, or Uno Platform. Builds…
ios-accessibility
Build and audit SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit accessibility for VoiceOver, Voice Control, Switch Control, Full Keyboard Access, Dynamic Type, focus restoration, labels/traits/actions, traversal, custom rotors, NSAccessibility, XCTest checks, adaptive system preferences, and App Store accessibility declarations. Use when…
pencilkit
Add Apple Pencil drawing with PKCanvasView, PKToolPicker, PKDrawing serialization/export, stroke inspection, and PencilKit/PaperKit handoffs. Use when building drawing apps, annotation features, handwriting capture, signature fields, content-version-safe ink workflows, or Apple Pencil-powered experiences on…