Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste --skill competitive-teardowngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/competitive-teardown)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/competitive-teardown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/competitive-teardown/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/competitive-teardown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/competitive-teardown.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00515 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-teardown scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Competitive Teardown
Process
1. Define the Comparison Set
- Direct competitors — Same problem, same audience
- Indirect competitors — Same audience, different approach
- Aspirational references — Different category, similar quality bar
2. Experience the Product (don't just screenshot it)
- Complete the onboarding flow
- Try the core use case end-to-end
- Hit an error state
- Try to cancel/delete/undo
- Use it on mobile
- Read their support docs
3. Analyze Systematically
UX Patterns
| Pattern | Competitor A | Competitor B | Our Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding | ... | ... | ... |
| Navigation | ... | ... | ... |
| Core action | ... | ... | ... |
| Empty states | ... | ... | ... |
| Error handling | ... | ... | ... |
Design Quality
- Visual hierarchy clarity (1-5)
- Typography quality (1-5)
- Color system coherence (1-5)
- Interaction feedback (1-5)
- Accessibility (1-5)
- Mobile experience (1-5)
- Loading/performance (1-5)
Positioning
- What do they claim to be?
- What are they actually?
- Who are they really serving?
- What's their pricing strategy?
- How do they differentiate?
4. Identify Opportunities
Gaps — What do all competitors do poorly? Conventions — What patterns are consistent (probably necessary)? Differentiators — Where could we be meaningfully different? Risks — What are competitors doing that we should worry about?
Output Format
## Competitive Teardown: [Category]
### Landscape Summary
[2-3 sentences on the competitive landscape]
### Competitor Profiles
[One paragraph per competitor: who they are, what they do well, where they're weak]
### Pattern Comparison Matrix
[Table comparing key UX patterns across competitors]
### Design Quality Scores
[Radar chart or scored table]
### Opportunities
[Ranked list of opportunities based on gap analysis]
### Strategic Recommendations
[2-3 specific recommendations with rationale]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 81 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 1c3f41c7381e
competitive-teardown is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 515 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
scroll-craft
Build premium scroll-driven landing pages for service, product, food, and drink brands. Plan the visitor journey, page grammar, emotional peak, and bespoke signature move. Create dimensional heroes with independent visual planes, restrained motion, and separate mobile composition. Use supplied photos and footage or…
accessibility
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
auteur
Design and build complete web experiences from scratch — award-level product and marketing pages, cinematic scroll-directed sites where the page is directed like a film, and multi-screen products (app, dashboard, admin, settings, onboarding, docs site) built as one design system with every component, state and route…
brand-visual-language
A brand's visual tone — playful or serious, rounded or angular — should be consistent across all UI elements. Shape language in typography, border-radius, and iconography communicates personality before a single word is read. Use when establishing a design system, choosing icon libraries, setting border-radius tokens…
loading-states-and-perceived-performance
Manage user expectations during wait times with appropriate loading states — from simple spinners to complex skeleton screens and staggered animations. Perceived performance is often more important than actual load time. Use when designing data-heavy components, handling API calls, building hero sections, or improving…
global-toolbar-controls
Quick global settings — currency, language, region, units — belong in a persistent, low-profile location such as a header toolbar or footer. These controls are frequent but not primary, so they use small typography and stay out of the main content hierarchy. Use when designing global selectors, locale switchers, or…