Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/main/.claude/skills/core-engineering/review-steering/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/review-steering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/review-steering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/review-steering.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00974 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00097 |
Grade B, and why
review-steering scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
8. Stamp the final line with `<!-- rules-hash: <hash> -->`, where `<hash>` is the output of `cat .claude/rules/code-quality.md .claude/rules/security.md | shasum -a 256 | cut -d' ' -f1`. `scripts/check-invariants.sh`'s ` The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 55 lines · 66 tokens per session scan B 361043c53bf0
review-steering is a skill published in the GitHub repository dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework (118 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 974 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Code review assistance with linting, style checking, and best practices.
good-docs-audit
Audit a doc, guide, README, or block of prose against the good-docs-writing style guide and report violations. Use when the user asks to review, critique, lint, or check the voice and tone of documentation or text. Produces a structured findings report (file:line, rule violated, offending text, suggested rewrite) and…
docs-decisions
Work on Composio documentation content, Fumadocs configuration, changelogs, docs automation prompts, docs decisions, ADR-style records, and docs review guidance. Use for files under docs/, documentation workflows, or requests to record or update a docs decision. Do not use for SDK runtime changes unless docs are the…
cross-review
Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…