Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/main/.claude/skills/swarm-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/swarm-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/swarm-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/swarm-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/swarm-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework/swarm-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01051 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00526 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
swarm-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 141 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 2ee69c708f6f
swarm-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework (118 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,051 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Code review assistance with linting, style checking, and best practices.
good-docs-audit
Audit a doc, guide, README, or block of prose against the good-docs-writing style guide and report violations. Use when the user asks to review, critique, lint, or check the voice and tone of documentation or text. Produces a structured findings report (file:line, rule violated, offending text, suggested rewrite) and…
docs-decisions
Work on Composio documentation content, Fumadocs configuration, changelogs, docs automation prompts, docs decisions, ADR-style records, and docs review guidance. Use for files under docs/, documentation workflows, or requests to record or update a docs decision. Do not use for SDK runtime changes unless docs are the…
cross-review
Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
review-loop
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified"…