Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/drizzy07x/skillquiver/research-systematicallynpx skills add Drizzy07x/Skillquiver --skill research-systematicallygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Drizzy07x/SkillquiverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drizzy07x/skillquiver/research-systematically)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drizzy07x/skillquiver/research-systematically"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drizzy07x/skillquiver/research-systematically.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01412 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00706 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
research-systematically scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Systematically
Turn an uncertain question into a reproducible research record without presenting exploration as confirmation, and ground every external-API claim in current, version-matched documentation instead of recollection.
Keep a research record
Maintain one plain file (markdown or JSON, in a scratch directory or outside the repo) holding: the research question, the frozen plan, an evidence log, dead ends, pivots, and the final verdict. Append to the evidence log; never rewrite or delete earlier entries. The pre-registration section is written once and left untouched after results exist.
1. Freeze the question
Before collecting any result evidence, write down:
- The question, stated once.
- Hypotheses, each with a concrete prediction and a falsifier — what observation would prove it wrong.
- Methods and planned experiments, each with a stable ID.
- Stopping rules: what ends the research besides an answer.
Do not edit this section after results are known. Record deviations, failed approaches, and pivots as new entries instead of rewriting the original plan.
2. Establish local versions before consulting docs
When the research or implementation touches an external library, framework, SDK, CLI, or cloud API:
- Inspect the manifest or lockfile first. The repository, not memory, says which release is installed.
- Never guess a version the repository can provide.
- Local code, callers, and tests stay authoritative for project behavior; external docs describe the external contract only.
3. Retrieve version-matched documentation
Prefer freshness over recollection: an API surface that may have drifted is confirmed against a current source, not recalled.
- If a documentation-lookup MCP tool (such as Context7) is available: resolve the library ID, pick the closest name with suitable coverage and reputation, prefer an ID matching the locally installed version, and query one concrete topic.
- Otherwise use the vendor's authoritative documentation directly and note which channel was used.
- At most three documentation queries per task. Split unrelated topics into separate queries.
- Never send credentials, private source, customer data, or complete error dumps in a query.
- For each lookup, log: library, version matched, exact query or topic, source URL, and retrieval date. Treat a lookup as stale once the installed dependency version changes or the entry is older than about a day — re-retrieve rather than reuse.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 102 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 1819c62d3021
research-systematically is a skill published in the GitHub repository Drizzy07x/Skillquiver (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,412 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…