Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/drn/dots/depsnpx skills add drn/dots --skill depsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drn/dotsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
deps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dependency Audit & Upgrade
Audit outdated dependencies, check for known vulnerabilities, and upgrade with automatic test verification. Rolls back any upgrade that breaks tests.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS- Optional:audit(check only, no changes),upgrade(apply upgrades), or a specific package name to focus on
Context
- Project type: !
find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name go.mod -o -name Gemfile -o -name package.json -o -name Cargo.toml -o -name pyproject.toml \) 2>/dev/null | head -5 - Lockfiles: !
find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name go.sum -o -name Gemfile.lock -o -name package-lock.json -o -name yarn.lock -o -name pnpm-lock.yaml -o -name Cargo.lock -o -name poetry.lock -o -name uv.lock \) 2>/dev/null | head -5
Instructions
Step 1: Detect package manager
Based on the context above, identify the package manager:
| File | Package Manager | Outdated Command |
|---|---|---|
go.mod |
Go modules | go list -m -u all |
Gemfile |
Bundler | bundle outdated |
package.json |
npm/yarn/pnpm | npm outdated or yarn outdated |
Cargo.toml |
Cargo | cargo outdated (if installed) |
pyproject.toml |
pip/poetry/uv | pip list --outdated or poetry show --outdated |
IF no recognized package manager is found, report "No supported package manager detected." and stop.
IF multiple are found, process each in order.
Step 2: Audit outdated dependencies
Run the appropriate outdated command. Parse the output into a table:
| Package | Current | Latest | Type |
|---------|---------|--------|------|
| foo | 1.2.3 | 2.0.0 | Major |
| bar | 1.0.0 | 1.1.0 | Minor |
| baz | 1.0.0 | 1.0.1 | Patch |
Classify each as Major, Minor, or Patch based on semver difference.
Step 3: Check for vulnerabilities
Run the appropriate audit command:
| Package Manager | Audit Command |
|---|---|
| Go | govulncheck ./... (if installed, otherwise skip) |
| Bundler | bundle audit check (if installed, otherwise skip) |
| npm | npm audit |
| Cargo | cargo audit (if installed, otherwise skip) |
| pip | pip-audit (if installed, otherwise skip) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 125 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A e179094601c5
deps is a skill published in the GitHub repository drn/dots (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,116 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.