Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/drn/dots/equipnpx skills add drn/dots --skill equipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drn/dotsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01996 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00998 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00200 |
Grade A, and why
equip scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill & Agent Gap Analysis
Analyze a specification document, PRD, RFC, codebase, or set of requirements against the existing skill and agent inventory. Identify gaps, propose new skills or agents to fill them, then write the approved ones.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS- Required: path to a spec/PRD file, URL, codebase directory, or a description of the requirements to analyze
If no arguments are provided, ask the user what to analyze.
Context
- Project root: !
pwd - Existing skills: !
ls agents/skills/ 2>/dev/null | head -40 - Custom agents: !
ls agents/custom/ 2>/dev/null | head -20 - Skill descriptions: !
grep -r "^description:" agents/skills/*/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null | head -40 - Agent descriptions: !
grep "^description:" agents/custom/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -20 - Project type: !
find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name go.mod -o -name Gemfile -o -name package.json -o -name Cargo.toml -o -name pyproject.toml \) 2>/dev/null | head -3
Instructions
Step 1: Load the Source
Determine the input source from $ARGUMENTS:
- File path — Read the file directly
- URL — Fetch and extract the content
- Notion page — Use Notion MCP tools if available, otherwise fetch the URL
- Directory path — Scan the codebase for workflows, patterns, and integration points
- Pasted text — If the user pasted requirements inline, use that
- Description — If the user described the requirements conversationally, extract the capabilities from their description
If the source cannot be loaded, report the error and stop.
Step 2: Extract Capabilities
Parse the source material and extract a structured list of capabilities — the distinct things the product needs to do. For each capability, note:
- Name — short label (e.g., "user onboarding flow", "webhook retry logic")
- Type — one of: workflow, integration, automation, analysis, content generation, data pipeline, monitoring, deployment
- Actors — who or what performs it (human, agent, system, CI)
- Triggers — what initiates it (user command, schedule, event, manual)
- Complexity — low / medium / high (based on number of steps, external dependencies, error handling needed)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 211 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 939c93210597
equip is a skill published in the GitHub repository drn/dots (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,996 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…