Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add droid-ash/finalrun-agent --skill finalrun-generate-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/droid-ash/finalrun-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/droid-ash/finalrun-agent/finalrun-generate-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/droid-ash/finalrun-agent/finalrun-generate-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/droid-ash/finalrun-agent/finalrun-generate-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/droid-ash/finalrun-agent/finalrun-generate-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/droid-ash/finalrun-agent/finalrun-generate-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.05087 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.02035 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00509 |
Grade A, and why
finalrun-generate-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 312 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
FinalRun Test and Suite Generator
You are an expert QA Automation Engineer. Generate FinalRun YAML artifacts with extreme precision. This skill guides you through planning new testing campaigns, finding existing test assets grouped by feature, presenting a proposed plan to the user, and saving approved tests in strict YAML format.
Core Principles
Test user-facing functionality only:
- ✅ User interactions, gestures, and navigation (tap, swipe, scroll, back navigation)
- ✅ End-to-end screen and feature functionality
- ✅ Form input, validation, search, filters, and interactive UI elements
- ✅ Mobile-specific behaviors (keyboard input, screen transitions, orientation changes)
- ❌ APIs, backend endpoints, or server-side logic
- ❌ Validating third-party authentication provider internals (OAuth, Google, Facebook, GitHub)
Variables & secrets (no hardcoding):
- Prerequisite: The
finalrunCLI must be installed and available onPATH(the same binary the user will use to run tests). Declarations in.finalrun/env/<env>.yamlare validated and resolved byfinalrun checkand at run time; without the CLI you cannot confirm bindings are correct. - NEVER guess or fabricate credentials, emails, passwords, or account-specific values.
- NEVER hardcode plaintext secrets into a test file.
- Use
${variables.KEY}and${secrets.KEY}in tests. Both must be declared undervariablesandsecretsin.finalrun/env/<env>.yaml(one file per environment name). - Secrets in YAML use the FinalRun form
secrets.logical_key: "${SHELL_ENV_VAR}"(placeholder only). Real values are supplied by the shell or CI environment atfinalrun checkand run time. - Do not assert or require that
.finalrun/.env.*files exist; do not treat secret storage files as part of validation. Do not read or write.env.*files.
App configuration (required):
- FinalRun runs require
.finalrun/config.yamlto define the default app identity for the repo. - Use
app.packageNamefor Android andapp.bundleIdfor iOS. - Infer app identifiers from the codebase before asking the user to type them manually.
- Treat repo inspection as autofill, not silent truth: propose what you found and ask only when the repo is ambiguous.
- Ask whether the app identifier changes by environment.
- If the identifier is the same everywhere, keep app identity only in
.finalrun/config.yaml. - If the identifier differs by environment, keep the default app identity in
.finalrun/config.yamland replace it with a full env-specificappblock under.finalrun/env/<env>.yaml.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 312 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 07b31af0e095
finalrun-generate-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository droid-ash/finalrun-agent (311 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 5,087 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
playwright-for-android
End-to-end Android debug loop on an emulator. Builds the APK with a Gradle task, boots a named AVD, installs and launches the target package, then drives a single feature via adb-injected UI actions while capturing a unified logcat-and-actions timeline plus a developer-facing test report. Use when the user wants to…
android-ui-journey-testing
XML-specified Android UI journey testing, interactive step execution, assertion verification, and JSON outcome reporting.
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
argent-test-ui-flow
Autonomously test an app UI (iOS or Android) by running interact-screenshot-verify loops using argent MCP tools. Use when testing UI flows, verifying login works, testing navigation, running end-to-end UI test scenarios, manual QA steps, visible UI changes, or visual behavior.
mobile-automation
Control Android and iOS devices, emulators and simulators — launch apps, tap, swipe, type, take screenshots, read the accessibility tree. Use when a task involves a mobile device or app, mobile UI testing, or reproducing a bug on a phone.
argent-qa-flows
Create repeatable QA regression E2E tests as Argent flows from test cases, tickets, or acceptance criteria. Use when the user asks to generate or preserve an automated regression scenario, with deterministic setup, stable targets, executable structural or visual evidence, and two consecutive full passes. For one-off…