Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to drujensen/aiagent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/drujensen/aiagent/main/.claude/skills/devops-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drujensen/aiagentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drujensen/aiagent/devops-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drujensen/aiagent/devops-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drujensen/aiagent/devops-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drujensen/aiagent/devops-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drujensen/aiagent/devops-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00471 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
devops-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
DevOps Review
DevOps review for:
Instructions
You are orchestrating a DevOps Review cycle for the aiagent project.
Phase 1: DevOps Work
- Use the Agent tool with
subagent_type: "devops"to perform the work - Pass it the story description
- The devops agent will:
- Modify
.github/workflows/release.ymland/orDockerfile/compose.ymlas needed - Ensure all 7 build targets are maintained unless explicitly removing one
- Verify no secrets are embedded
- Check go version consistency with
go.mod
- Modify
Phase 2: Review
4. Use the Agent tool with subagent_type: "devops-reviewer" to review the changes
5. Pass the devops agent's output and list of changed files
6. The reviewer will verify all targets, scan for secrets, and score against the 6 pillars
Phase 3: Iterate 7. If overall score >= 8/10 (APPROVED): Report the pipeline changes and scores 8. If overall score < 8/10 (REVISE):
- Extract Critical Issues from the reviewer
- Send issues back to the devops agent
- Re-review with the devops-reviewer
- Repeat until APPROVED or 3 iterations maximum
Phase 4: Report 9. Present:
- Pipeline changes summary
- Build target verification (all 7 present?)
- Final pillar scores table
Important
- Maximum 3 review iterations
- The devops MODIFIES FILES; the reviewer only READS and SCORES
- Never remove a build target without explicit user confirmation
- No secrets in committed files — use GitHub Actions secrets
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 50 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 8f16ea58cce8
devops-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository drujensen/aiagent (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 471 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
deployment-patterns
Deployment workflows, CI/CD pipeline patterns, Docker containerization, health checks, rollback strategies, and production readiness checklists for web applications. Use when setting up deployment infrastructure or planning releases.
devops
DevOps - Docker, CI/CD, cloud infra, monitoring.
performing-container-security-scanning-with-trivy
Scan container images, filesystems, and Kubernetes manifests for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, exposed secrets, and license compliance issues using Aqua Security Trivy with SBOM generation and CI/CD integration.
devops-infrastructure
Guides Docker, CI/CD pipelines, deployment strategies, infrastructure as code, and observability setup. Use when writing Dockerfiles, configuring GitHub Actions, planning deployments, setting up monitoring, or when asked about containers, pipelines, Terraform, or production infrastructure.
devops-deployment
Use when setting up CI/CD pipelines, containerizing applications, deploying to Kubernetes, or writing infrastructure as code. DevOps & Deployment covers GitHub Actions, Docker, Helm, and Terraform patterns.
CI/CD Pipeline Advanced
Expert-level CI/CD pipeline skill for test automation. Covers GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, parallel execution, matrix strategies, caching, artifact management, and deployment gates.