Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/threat-model-analystnpx skills add drvoss/everything-copilot-cli --skill threat-model-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/threat-model-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/threat-model-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/threat-model-analyst.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00602 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
threat-model-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Threat Model Analyst
Perform architecture-first security analysis using STRIDE-A: classic STRIDE plus explicit abuse-case thinking.
When to Use
- A new system or subsystem needs an initial threat model
- A major change landed and the question is "what changed security-wise?"
- You need to reason about trust boundaries, data flows, or risky integrations before implementation
- A security review needs architecture evidence, not only code-pattern scanning
When NOT to Use
| Instead of threat-model-analyst | Use |
|---|---|
| Code-level vulnerability scanning | security-scan or pr-security-review |
| Broad repository posture scoring | evaluate-repository |
| Agent-specific OWASP checklist review | agent-owasp-check |
| Supply-chain integrity validation | agent-supply-chain |
Modes
Single Analysis
Use when there is no prior threat model or when the whole system needs review.
Incremental Analysis
Use when a previous threat model exists and you need to compare the current system or a specific commit against that baseline.
Incremental mode is often the better day-to-day workflow because it highlights:
- new threats
- resolved threats
- still-present threats
- trust-boundary changes
- differences in severity or exploitability
Workflow
1. Define scope and assets
Clarify:
- what system or subsystem is in scope
- what assets matter most
- what actors exist
- what trust boundaries separate them
List obvious inputs and high-value outcomes before reading code in detail.
2. Build an architecture and data-flow sketch
You do not need perfect diagrams before analysis, but you do need a concrete model of:
- components
- entry points
- data stores
- external systems
- privileged execution zones
- trust boundaries between them
Represent the system as a lightweight DFD or component map if helpful.
3. Apply STRIDE-A to each component and flow
For each component or trust boundary, ask:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Spoofing | Who could impersonate a user, service, or agent? |
| Tampering | What data or configuration could be modified without detection? |
| Repudiation | What actions would be hard to prove later? |
| Information Disclosure | What could leak across the boundary? |
| Denial of Service | What could exhaust or block the system? |
| Elevation of Privilege | What paths raise privileges unexpectedly? |
| Abuse | What realistic misuse path would an attacker or insider choose? |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 183 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 92df3a3083e9
threat-model-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository drvoss/everything-copilot-cli (45 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,205 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
winui-design
Use when designing, reviewing, or fixing WinUI 3: sample and control discovery with winapp find-ui, layout planning, control choice, Fluent Design alignment, Light/Dark/High Contrast theming, typography, spacing, brushes, accessibility, and XAML data-binding design. Load before authoring new XAML, reviewing UI PRs…
winui-dev-workflow
Build and run workflow for WinUI 3 apps with WinApp CLI 0.6+ — project creation with winapp new, project-mode winapp run, BuildAndRun.ps1 analyzer integration, crash diagnosis, and prerequisites. Use when creating, building, running, or fixing build errors in a WinUI 3 project.
winui-packaging
MSIX packaging, code signing, and distribution for WinUI 3 apps — build for release, certificate generation (winapp cert generate), certificate trust, code signing (winapp sign), self-contained deployment, CI/CD with GitHub Actions, and Microsoft Store submission. Use when preparing for release, creating MSIX…
winui-session-report
Analyze the current or a recent agent session (GitHub Copilot CLI or Claude Code) and generate a diagnostic report. Use only when the user explicitly asks for session feedback, agent debugging, or a review of what happened during a build session. Do not inspect session data automatically.
microsoft-build
Your companion for Microsoft Build 2026. Helps you find sessions relevant to your project, discover what's new for your tech stack, scaffold projects from sessions, and plan your event schedule. Activate when users mention sessions, schedule, what's new, Build, Ignite, AI Tour, Microsoft event, conference, or…
journey-template
Create new agentic journeys from app ideas. Generates README.md (learner walkthrough), PLAN.md (AI-readable spec), and app-specific skills for OSS deployments. Supports any stack (Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, Swift, Kotlin) and Azure service (Container Apps, AKS, Functions, App Service). USE FOR: new journey, scaffold…