Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/review-standardsnpx skills add dryvist/claude-code-plugins --skill review-standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dryvist/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/review-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/review-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/review-standards.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Standards
Review Focus Areas
When reviewing code, prioritize:
- Security vulnerabilities and hardcoded secrets
- Performance implications of algorithmic choices
- Maintainability and code clarity
- Test coverage and TDD compliance
- Documentation accuracy and completeness
- DRY violations and code duplication
- Standards compliance per code-quality-standards
PR Review Principles
- Be pragmatic: Perfect security that blocks all work is worse than reasonable security that enables productivity.
- Trust context: If a permission is requested for a legitimate workflow, assume good faith.
- Quantify risk: Ask "how often would this actually cause harm?" not "could this ever cause harm?"
Permission & Configuration Reviews
Focus on likely failures, not theoretical edge cases. Do not reject based on contrived scenarios unlikely in practice. Balance security with usability — overly restrictive permissions that impede workflows are themselves a failure.
Related Skills
- code-quality-standards (code-standards) — Use when writing or reviewing code and documentation
- pr-standards (git-standards) — PR & issue standards, PR guards, issue linking
- finalize-pr (github-workflows) — Manage your PR through the full author flow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 40 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 844a5f3ff04d
review-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository dryvist/claude-code-plugins (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
rspec
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write specs", "create spec", "add RSpec tests", "fix failing spec", or mentions RSpec, describe blocks, it blocks, expect syntax, test doubles, or matchers. Should also be used when editing spec.rb files, working in spec/ directory, planning implementation phases that…
activerecord
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a migration", "add a column", "add column to table", "create an index", "add a foreign key", "set up associations", "fix N+1 queries", "optimize queries", "add validations", "create callbacks", "use eager loading", or mentions ActiveRecord, belongsto, hasmany…
dragonruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a game", "make a game", "game development", "dragonruby", "drgtk", "game loop", "tick method", "sprite rendering", "game state", or mentions args.outputs, args.state, args.inputs, coordinate system, collision detection, animation frames, or scene management.…
draper-decorators
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a decorator", "write a decorator", "move logic into decorator", "clean logic out of the view", "isn't it decorator logic", "test a decorator", or mentions Draper, keeping views clean, or representation logic in decorators. Should also be used when editing…
mcp-server
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an MCP server", "build MCP tools", "define MCP prompts", "register MCP resources", "implement Model Context Protocol", or mentions the mcp gem, MCP::Server, MCP::Tool, JSON-RPC transport, stdio transport, or streamable HTTP transport. Should also be used when…
ratatui-ruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a TUI", "terminal interface", "terminal UI", "ratatui", "ratatui-ruby", "inline viewport", "full-screen terminal app", "terminal widgets", "tui.draw", "tui.pollevent", or mentions RatatuiRuby.run, managed loop, terminal rendering, Tea MVU, or building CLI…