Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dslsdzc/rev-skills --skill re-managedgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dslsdzc/rev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dslsdzc/rev-skills/re-managed)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dslsdzc/rev-skills/re-managed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dslsdzc/rev-skills/re-managed/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dslsdzc/rev-skills/re-managed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dslsdzc/rev-skills/re-managed.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00152 | $0.02122 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.01061 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00424 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
re-managed scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
托管代码逆向（.NET / Java / 脚本）
完整工作流
- 识别运行时（不先判型就反编译是最大浪费）：
- PE 文件：
file输出含 "Mono/.Net assembly"、PE 可选头数据目录第 15 项（COM Descriptor / CLI header）非零、导入mscoree.dll→ .NET 程序集 → [[re-dotnet]] - jar/war/class：
unzip -p app.jar META-INF/MANIFEST.MF见Main-Class、class 文件魔数CAFEBABE→ Java 字节码 → [[re-java]] - 脚本/宏：shebang（
#!/usr/bin/pwsh）、-EncodedCommand/IEX（PowerShell）、OLE 文档（file显示 "Composite Document"）内嵌 VBA、eval(/fromCharCode（JavaScript）→ [[re-script-deob]] - 拿不准先 [[re-triage]] 初勘（file/hash/熵/strings），不要凭扩展名猜
- PE 文件：
- 反编译：按识别结果走 [[re-dotnet]] / [[re-java]] / [[re-script-deob]]，先把目标逻辑还原成可读代码
- 去混淆：各原子技能内含对应方案——de4dot（ConfuserEx/SmartAssembly）、混淆识别 + 字符串解密（ProGuard/Allatori）、逐层解码（脚本/宏）；混杂原生组件（native stub / JNI）的反混淆转 [[re-deobfuscate]]
- 恶意场景（钓鱼宏、下载器脚本、恶意 .NET/Java 样本）：转 [[re-malware]] 网关——默认沙箱 → 行为分析 → C2/协议 → IOC/报告；反编译还原结果作为静态证据回传给 [[re-malware]] 使用
何时用哪个原子技能（选择树）
按运行时分支：
- PE 且确认 .NET 元数据（CLI header / mscoree） → [[re-dotnet]]（dnSpy/ILSpy 反编译、de4dot 去混淆）
- jar / war / class（Java 字节码） → [[re-java]]（CFR/JD-GUI、javap、加固脱壳）
- .ps1 / .docm / .xlsm / .js / .jse / .hta（脚本或宏） → [[re-script-deob]]（逐层解码，动态执行默认沙箱）
- Python 打包样本（.exe 含 PyInstaller/PyArmor 特征 / .pyc / python 打包） → [[re-python]]（pyinstxtractor 解包、PyArmor-Unpacker、pyc 反编译；纯脚本混淆转 [[re-script-deob]]）
- .wasm / WebAssembly 模块（网页/Node 侧载荷） → [[re-wasm]]（WABT 解析 section、wasm-decompile 反编译、DevTools/wasmtime 动态）
- AI 模型相关 → [[re-ai-triage]] 分流：模型文件（.onnx/.safetensors/.pt）→ [[re-ai-model]]（格式识别、权重提取、文件级水印；未知 pkl 默认隔离）；仅 API → [[re-ai-attack]]（行为层评估，guard 授权前置）
- EVM 合约字节码（.bin / hex） → [[re-blockchain]]（ABI 恢复、panoramix 反编译、漏洞分析）
- 浏览器扩展（crx/xpi/zip 扩展文件） → [[re-browser-ext]]（权限审计/恶意行为/混淆还原）
- Electron 打包应用（resources/app.asar） → [[re-electron]]（asar 解包、V8 字节码边界、CDP 动态调试）
- Java Card / SIM（CAP 文件） → [[re-javacard]]（12 组件解析、process(APDU) 分派还原）
- Android DEX → 不是本网关——转 [[re-mobile]]（[[re-apk]]），其中含 Java 原生逻辑再回 [[re-java]]
- 仅脚本调用 native 下载的 PE → 动态侧跟 [[re-malware]]，静态侧回 [[re-binary-core]]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 62 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A b09431afdee5
re-managed is a skill published in the GitHub repository dslsdzc/rev-skills (54 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 2,122 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware in Ghidra by parsing Go buildinfo and pclntab structures, recovering stripped/obfuscated function names (e.g. via GoResolver), and extracting embedded module/dependency strings and types from Go binaries. Use when analyzing a Go-language malware sample, deobfuscating a…
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware using Ghidra with specialized scripts for function recovery, string extraction, and type reconstruction in stripped Go binaries.
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware using Ghidra with specialized scripts for function recovery, string extraction, and type reconstruction in stripped Go binaries.
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Use when reverse engineer Go-compiled malware using Ghidra with specialized scripts for function recovery, string extraction, and type reconstruction in stripped Go binaries. Use when reverseing engineer go-compiled malware using ghidra with specialized scripts for.
analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python
Parse Windows Prefetch (.pf) files with the windowsprefetch Python library to reconstruct application execution history, run counts, and accessed file/volume lists. Use when investigating renamed or masquerading binaries, verifying program execution timelines, or hunting for suspicious execution patterns in incident…
analyzing-golang-malware-with-ghidra
Reverse engineer Go-compiled malware using Ghidra with specialized scripts for function recovery, string extraction, and type reconstruction in stripped Go binaries.