Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatformnpx agentmods add skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiativeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiative)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiative/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/initiative.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.06106 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.02442 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00611 |
Grade A, and why
initiative scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 341 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex compatibility note:
- Invoke
$skill-name: load the registered.agents/skills/<name>/SKILL.mdand execute it with Codex tools; no separateSkilltool or Claude mode switch is needed. Author.claude/**; mirrors are generated.- Track steps before execution and keep progress/evidence current. Explicit skill requests execute their protocol. Use the native question tool for required questions.
- Map foreign tool names to available host capabilities. A name mismatch needs no approval; an actually unavailable required capability stops with its step/evidence and a user question before adaptation.
- Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required
spawn_agentsubagent(s) for that task.- Preserve protocol order unless the user approves a deviation. Workflows use
$start-workflow: gates stay fixed; other steps may flex with logged reasons and evidence.
[BLOCKING] Run declared skill steps in order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge without explicit user approval. [BLOCKING] Update task tracking before/after each step or sub-skill:
in_progress→completed. [BLOCKING] Completed steps need brief evidence; skipped steps need an explicit reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, maintain an equivalent tracker with synchronized statuses.
Renamed: formerly
/idea; use$initiative. The old slash command has no alias.$work-item --mode=refineturns the initiative into delivery work.
AI-SDD Artifact Contract (M1–M7): Initiatives stay tech-agnostic business intent; logical IDs belong downstream, and abstract
[Source: namespace/service/id]anchors stay in a separate evidence carrier. Keep physical code coordinates and repository paths out of portable narrative. MUST ATTENTION READ.claude/skills/shared/sdd-artifact-contract.mdfor full mandate and carrier rules. Project Protocol Overlay: Resolve only the most-specific matching tier; derive body paths from overlay names, report malformed or missing bodies, and apply surviving rules additively without waiving framework or user-confirmation gates. MUST ATTENTION READ.claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.mdfor the full resolution contract.
Work tracking: Keep the project's tracked work current in the same change, as its root instructions (
CLAUDE.mdorAGENTS.md) say. When the project uses the portable tracker (taskTracking.modeisobserveorlinked), read the linked work integration guide at capture, start, saved-work, verification, handoff and close-out checkpoints. Use the actual linked producer and exact items; retain the primary outcome and record optional upkeep once through the common owner. Continue untracked when no link exists; acceptance remains explicit.Work record shape: The initiative file is a work record owned by
$task-track. Read Records another skill authors before writing or editing it:status: drafton capture, no assignee, and no decision or priority key of this skill's own. Approval and every later status, and the initiative's type, priority level, due date and areas, are tracker values recorded through$task-track; tracker-owned fields of a tracked record change only there.
Quick Summary
Goal: Turn a vague product idea into a validated, tech-agnostic, module-anchored initiative artifact ready for $work-item --mode=refine to convert into a task — preserving problem intent without leaking solution or stack choices.
Summary:
- Purpose: capture raw idea as structured, validated initiative artifact; preserve problem intent, keep the problem statement tech-agnostic with no solution/stack/IDs, and hand clean narrative to
$work-item --mode=refine. - Main steps/tasks (run in order): (1) Gather problem/value/users/scope; (2) Generate
INITIATIVE-{YYMMDD}-{NNN}draft frominitiative-template.md; (3) Capture problem/value/users; (4) Detect module through project structure and selected-profile canonical indexes/owners silently, prompting only if ambiguous/no match; (5) Load feature context (8-12K tokens: entities, BR-/TC patterns); (6) Save canonical artifact; (6.5) Discovery Interview — ONE interview of 4-6ask user question toolquestions; (7) Validation Summary — written from those answers, then ONE short unconditionalask user question toolconfirming the revised problem statement / scope (not a second interview); (8) Suggest$work-item --mode=refine. - Modes/gates: Existing repo → silently detect module and load context; Greenfield → skip module detection and structure reads, use market/WebSearch context, ask business questions more often, and NEVER ask about tech stack. The Discovery Interview (Step 6.5: 4-6 questions incl. always-on testability, each category asked once) and the Validation Summary with its one confirm question (Step 7) are NON-NEGOTIABLE.
- Output: Persist to
initiatives/{YYMMDD}-{role}-initiative-{slug}.mdunder the team-artifacts root (defaultteam-artifacts; adocsRoots.teamArtifacts.pathentry indocs/project-config.jsonoverrides the path) witht_shirt_size; downstream task ownsFR-/BR-IDs and inherits the clean narrative.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 341 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 2ba9d355d71a
initiative is a skill published in the GitHub repository duc01226/EasyPlatform (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 6,106 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…