Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dupe-com/standdown --skill adoptgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dupe-com/standdownWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dupe-com/standdown/adopt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dupe-com/standdown/adopt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dupe-com/standdown/adopt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dupe-com/standdown/adopt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dupe-com/standdown/adopt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00115 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00337 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
adopt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
adopt-standdown: brownfield migration onto standdown
ADOPTING.md at the repo root is the source of truth. This skill is a thin
router that walks the agent through its five phases and enforces the one
non-negotiable: shadow-observe and reconcile before you cut over — never
big-bang-replace revenue-critical stand-down logic.
First, confirm this is a brownfield case: the target already stands down
today (Phase 1 grep will show disable_domains, ignore_param, cookie/param
checks, a fetched/fallback policy, or "stand down"/"suppress" code). If it has
none, stop and use the greenfield setup skill (/standdown:setup) instead.
Then read ADOPTING.md and drive its phases in order. Do not summarize from
memory — the detail (grep table, mapping table, invariant constraints, worked
Dupe example) lives there.
- DETECT — grep the whole repo (background worker, content scripts, and any policy-serving server) and build the detection inventory: one row per rule with network/merchant, exact current behavior, file:line, and any TTL.
- MAP — translate each row to exactly one
standdownconcept via the mapping table (params→landingParams, cookies→cookiePatternsname-only, merchant blocks→disableHosts, own attribution→selfPatterns+selfExemptionScope). Match current fleet behavior, not the full library. - SHADOW — baseline grade → observe-only beside the real path (namespaced shadow key / analytics, no action taken) → reconcile every divergence (safe-stricter / dangerous-more-permissive / needs-human-decision) → flagged cutover (off-by-default) → delete old code last.
- GUARD — hold the invariants as hard constraints: no network call in the decision path (I1), fail toward standing down (I3), monotone/never lift an active stand-down (I4), cookie NAMES only (I2).
- VERIFY — characterization tests, audit grade ≥ baseline, no-fail-open assertions, flag off by default, old code retained as rollback.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A 328f7b3d9022
adopt is a skill published in the GitHub repository dupe-com/standdown (5 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
adopt compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adoptdupe-com/standdown | Skill | 5 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code |
| chrome-extensionericrisco/rsc-harness | Skill | 598 | today | MIT | A | 76 | Claude Code, Codex |
| browser-extension-patternsorganvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills | Skill | 17 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| browser-extension-builderfindscripter/everything-skills | Skill | 11 | today | none | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| category-designerGingg7260/affiliate-skills | Skill | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code, Codex |
| compliance-checkerGingg7260/affiliate-skills | Skill | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 87 | Codex |
| self-improverGingg7260/affiliate-skills | Skill | 5 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 87 | Claude Code, Codex |