Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dustintrap/kvm-pilot/checkpointnpx skills add DustinTrap/kvm-pilot --skill checkpointgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DustinTrap/kvm-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dustintrap/kvm-pilot/checkpoint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dustintrap/kvm-pilot/checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dustintrap/kvm-pilot/checkpoint.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00164 | $0.06942 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00082 | $0.03471 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01388 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00694 |
Grade A, and why
checkpoint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/checkpoint — end-of-session safety sweep
A checkpoint asks one question: is everything I did this session durably captured, or is something quietly at risk of being lost? The next session is often a fresh agent with zero memory of this one — a gap here means redone work or a decision shipped on a false assumption. This replaces "I think I saved everything" with a reproducible sweep ending in SAFE TO STOP or N items need attention, each with the exact fix.
It is the mirror of a morning sweep (which asks what happened while I was away?). Stay in that lane: checkpoint does not score releasability (a separate concern) and does not re-run cloud/telemetry health checks.
Procedure
- Run the read-only scan (it mutates nothing — that's the safety property):
bash .claude/skills/checkpoint/scan.sh - Interpret each surface against the rubric below — the judgement calls the script can't make. Do not skip a surface because it "looked fine"; read the facts.
- Emit the risk-ordered table + one-line verdict (format at the bottom). Highest-risk first.
- Always produce the resume handoff (§ Mandatory handoff) — this happens even on an all-✅ scan.
- Offer the exact fix for every ⚠️; run only the low-risk ones on the operator's go (commit-by-name, save-memory, fix-a-doc). Never promote/release; never blind-add.
- Meta-reflect and self-improve (§ Self-improvement) — the last thing you do. Did the scan raise a false positive (flagged something fine), miss something you only caught by hand, or produce noise? Did the table help? If yes, amend
scan.sh/SKILL.mdin this same run to encode the fix and add a § Version history row pairing the change with the real incident. This step is why the skill is worth more each run.
Rubric — interpret the scan, surface by surface (risk-ordered)
C1 · Version control & working tree — highest risk: unsaved code is unrecoverable
UNCOMMITTED> 0 → ⚠️ commit by name:git -C kvm-pilot commit -m "…" -- <paths>. Nevergit add -A/.(.gitignorecovers venv/artifacts/config.toml/.env, but a stray secret or large file under a new name would be committed irreversibly — stage by name).UNTRACKED_NOT_IGNORED> 0 → ⚠️ eyeball each: is it source to track, or a stray artifact/secret to ignore/delete? Never bulk-add.ON_PROTECTED_BRANCH: yes (main)— normal here, ✅, not a reason to branch. kvm-pilot is issue-per-finding direct-commit-to-main(CLAUDE.md; agent work is not branched). The C1 risk is unsaved work, not the branch — do not adviseswitch -c. (v0.2.0: the prior version wrongly assumed a feature-branch/PR flow.)UNPUSHED (ahead)> 0 → ⚠️ push it (git -C kvm-pilot push). On this project pushingmainruns CI and backs the work up; it does not release (a release needsgh release create). Commits left only-local are the actual work-at-risk. (v0.2.0.)BEHIND> 0 → ⚠️ note; rebase before more work.DEBUG_MARKERS_IN_DIFF> 0 (breakpoint()/pdb/console.log/FIXME/XXX) → ⚠️ remove before commit. Also eyeball the diff for strayprint(added to library modules (client.py,health.py, drivers/ — the CLI usesprintlegitimately, so the scan doesn't flag it).SECRET_SCANreports N possible literal(s) → 🔴 inspect each; if any is a real credential, ROTATE it (it's in the working diff or the last 25 commits — likely already pushed, so removing it doesn't undo the exposure). Heuristic (quotedpassword=/token=literals, inlineIPMI_PASSWORD=<value>, private-key headers; stock defaults likecalvin/adminand env/placeholder refs are excluded), so a hit is "eyeball this," not proof — but never dismiss one without looking. Do not put the secret in RESUME.md or any file to "track" it; RESUME.md is local-only (#209) and still must not hold raw secrets. (v0.10.0)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 136 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A 16eb49f2b769
checkpoint is a skill published in the GitHub repository DustinTrap/kvm-pilot (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 6,942 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
conventional-commits
Write clear, conventional git commit messages — type(scope): summary, imperative mood, a body that explains the why.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
git-commit
Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with type/scope/subject and detailed markdown body. Use when user wants to commit changes, create commit, save work, or stage and commit. Enforces project-specific conventions from CLAUDE.md. Each change type gets its own markdown heading (# emoji + type), with…
commit
Read this skill before making git commits.
et-git
ET git workflow for preparing commits and reviewing changes. Use when checking git status or diff, filtering unrelated files, staging task-scoped changes, writing Chinese commit messages, or synchronizing with remotes using rebase instead of merge.
commit
Smart commit: bump version, find related issues, commit with Co-authored-by, push. Use when the user says 'commit' or wants to finalize changes.